ARCHIVED - Télécom Commission Letter - 8740-M59-200506496
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 29 June 2005
File No.: 8740-M59-200506496
To: Attached Distribution List
Re: MTS Allstream Tariff Notice 565 - Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Data Access
The Independent Members of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (IMCAIP) requested, by letter dated 20 June 2005 , that the Commission delay any determination, interim or final, in respect of the MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) Tariff Notice 565, Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) Data Access, dated 1 June 2005 (TN 565). IMCAIP noted that the MTS Allstream application was not received by interested parties until 16 June 2005 . IMCAIP also noted that it had contacted MTS Allstream in order to request a meeting to pursue a "business negotiation" approach to arriving at a mutually agreeable tariff.
On 22 June 2005 , Bell Canada submitted comments supporting IMCAIP's request and further indicated their interest in being party to any discussions amongst parties regarding TN 565.
In light of the above, the process associated with TN 565 is suspended and the Commission will establish a revised process following advice by parties as to the outcome of their current discussions. Parties that have submitted comments to date will be given an opportunity to supplement their comments as appropriate as part of the revised process. Parties are encouraged to discuss the rates, terms and conditions associated with potential Competitor services in advance of filing a tariff application.
[original signed by Scott Hutton]
cc: Stephan Meyer, CRTC, (819) 953-7159
Distribution List: email@example.com ; Russell.firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; RegMatters@ontelcom.ca ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; Alexander.Adeyinka@sprint-canada.com ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.comDate Modified: 2005-06-29
- Date modified: