ARCHIVED - Telecom Commission Letter - 8622-T66-200503418

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Letter

Ottawa, 11 April 2005

File Number: 8622-T66-200503418

By fax and E-mail

(780) 493-6519
regulatory.affairs@telus.com

Willie Grieve
Vice President
Telecom Policy and Regulatory Affairs
TELUS Communications Inc.
21-10020 100 Street NW
Edmonton, Alberta
T5J 0N5 

Dear Mr. Grieve: 

Re: Application Regarding Shaw Communications Inc.'s Non-Compliance with Local Entry Rules 

The Commission has received an application by TELUS Communications Inc. dated 29 March 2005 filed under Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure , requesting that the Commission issue an order directing Shaw Communications Inc. and/or its affiliates to cease and desist from marketing or offering local telephone services in Calgary or in any other exchanges until such time as it has provided evidence of its compliance with all of the obligations for competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) set out in Local Competition, Telecom Decision 97-8, 1 May 1997. 

The Commission notes that in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , 7 April 2004 (Public Notice 2004-2), it initiated a proceeding to consider the appropriate regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol.

Whether cable companies are required to become a CLEC when they provide local VoIP services is an issue that was raised in that proceeding.   Cable companies argued that they should not be obliged to become a CLEC, whereas other parties argued that cable companies should be required to become CLECs.   The Commission notes that the record relating to the Public Notice 2004-2 proceeding is closed.  Further, the Commission intends to release its decision in that proceeding on or before 12 May 2005 .

In light of the foregoing, parties are advised that the Commission will deal with the above-noted application by TELUS following the release of its decision.  At that time, the Commission will provide such further directions on procedure as may be required.

Sincerely,

Chris Seidl
Senior Manager, Telecom Policy Decisions 

cc: Shaw Communications Inc.
Interested Parties - Telecom Public Notice 2004-2

Date Modified: 2005-04-11

Date modified: