ARCHIVED - Telecom - Commission Letter - 8622-C6-200503997
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 7 April 2005
Reference nos: 8622-C6-200503997
Dear Messrs Messier, Beland, Hennessy and Bibic:
Re: Applications in relation to the provision by Bell Canada of its Digital Voice Service Offering
The Commission has received applications by Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) and Quebecor Media In. (QMI) dated, respectively, 4 and 6 April 2005 requesting that the CRTC issue an expedited ex parte order directing Bell Canada to cease and desist immediately from offering its Digital Voice service recently made available to consumers in Québec City, Trois-Rivières and Sherbrooke, until such time as Bell Canada has secured proper tariff approval for the service in accordance with section 25 of the Telecommunications Act. By letter dated 4 April 2004 , the CCTA requested that the Commission immediately investigate whether Bell Canada 's Digital Voice service as currently offered is in compliance with sections 25 and 27 of the Telecommunications Act and take all necessary action to remedy the situation.
The Commission notes that in Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2004-2, Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol , 7 April 2004 (Public Notice 2004-2), it initiated a proceeding to consider the appropriate regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet Protocol. In Public Notice 2004-2, the Commission invited comments on its preliminary views, which included the following:
In the proceeding initiated by Public Notice 2004-2, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, société en commandite (collectively the Companies), TELUS Communications Inc. and TELUS Communications (Quebec) Inc. (collectively, TELUS) argued that when they provide VoIP services that operate over a retail broadband Internet connection obtained by the customer from a service supplier of his or her choice, the VoIP services are subject to the Commission's forbearance orders relating to retail Internet services.
Many other parties to the proceeding agreed with the Commission's preliminary views. They argued that VoIP services are not retail Internet services and that the ILECs must obtain Commission approval of tariffs in respect of local VoIP services that they provide.
Given that the Commission will soon dispose of the issue as to whether or not Bell Canada is required to file a tariff in respect of any or all VoIP service offerings in its decision in the Public Notice 2004-2 proceeding, parties are advised that the Commission will deal with the applications by Cogeco, QMI and CCTA following the release of its decision. At that time the Commission will provide such further directions on procedure as may be required.
ORIGINAL LETTER SIGNED BY/
c.c. Interested Parties - Telecom Public Notice 2004-2
Date Modified: 2005-04-07
- Date modified: