ARCHIVED - Telecom Order CRTC 2004-141
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Telecom Order CRTC 2004-141 |
|
| Ottawa, 28 April 2004 | |
Prince Rupert City Telephones |
|
| Reference: Tariff Notice 75 | |
Forbearance of Internet and asymmetrical digital subscriber line services |
|
|
1. |
The Commission received an application by Prince Rupert City Telephones (CityTel), dated 23 March 2004, to remove Internet and Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line services items from its General Tariff. |
|
2. |
The Commission received no comments with respect to the application. |
|
3. |
In Forbearance from retail Internet services, Telecom Order CRTC 99-592, 25 June 1999, the Commission determined that it would be appropriate to forbear from regulating retail Internet Services (IS) provided that a company separates retail IS assets, revenues and expenses from its rate base and shortfall subsidy calculation. |
|
4. |
In Regulatory framework for the small incumbent telephone companies, Decision CRTC 2001-756, 14 December 2001 (Decision 2001-756), the Commission established a new regulatory framework that focused on prices rather than earnings. |
|
5. |
Moreover, in Decision 2001-756, the Commission implemented the national total subsidy requirements calculation methodology, replacing the former rate of return subsidy calculation. |
|
6. |
Accordingly, the Commission notes that it has relieved the companies subject to Decision 2001-756 from the requirement to calculate their shortfall subsidy on a rate of return basis. In light of the above, the Commission considers it appropriate to forbear from regulating CityTel's retail IS service without requiring CityTel to separate its retail IS assets, revenues and expenses from its rate base and shortfall subsidy calculation. |
|
7. |
The Commission approves CityTel's application. The revisions take effect as of the date of this order. |
|
8. |
CityTel is to issue revised tariff pages forthwith to reflect these changes. |
| Secretary General | |
| This document is available in alternative format upon request and may also be examined at the following Internet site: www.crtc.gc.ca |
Date Modified: 2004-04-28
- Date modified: