Search

ARCHIVED - Telecom - Commission Letter - 8638-C12-59/02 - Decision 2001-756 - Clarification

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Letter

Ottawa, 14 April 2004

ERRATUM

File No. 8638-C12-59/02

BY FACSIMILE / E-MAIL

To: Distribution List

Re: Decision 2001-756 - Clarification

The Commission stated in paragraph 157 of Regulatory framework for the small incumbent telephone companies, Decision CRTC 2001-756, 14 December 2001 (Decision 2001-756), that neither Phase III forecasts nor depreciation filings are required under price regulation.

In response to an inquiry from the Ontario Telephone Association, Commission staff wish to clarify that the small independent companies are not required to file either Phase III forecasts/actual results or depreciation filings effective the date of Decision 2001-756.

Yours sincerely,

Suzanne Bédard
Senior Manager, Tariffs
Telecommunications

cc: Leah Ackerman, CRTC (819) 997-4577

Date modified: 2004-04-14

Date modified: