ARCHIVED - Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2002-2
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
|
Broadcasting Notice of Public Hearing CRTC 2002-2 |
See also: 2002-2-1 Ottawa, 1 March 2002 |
|
The Commission will hold a public hearing commencing on 6 May 2002 at 9:30 a.m., at the Conference Centre, Portage IV, 140 Promenade du Portage, Gatineau, Quebec, to consider the following: |
|
ITEM |
APPLICANT AND LOCALITY |
1 |
CHUM Limited (CKVR-TV) (e) |
2 |
CHUM Limited (CFPL-TV) (e) |
3 |
CHUM Limited (CHRO-TV) (e) |
4 |
CHUM Limited (CITY-TV) (e) |
5 |
CHUM Limited (CHWI-TV) (e) |
6 |
CHUM Limited (CKNX-TV) (e) |
7 |
CHUM Limited (CKVU-TV) (e) |
8 |
Telelatino Network Inc. |
9 |
Cable Public Affairs Channel Inc./La Chaîne d'affaires publique par Câble Inc. (e) |
10 |
The Family Channel Inc. |
11 |
Network Television International Inc. |
12 |
Viewers' Choice Canada Inc., Cogeco Radio-Télévision inc., TQS inc. and/et TVA Group Inc./Groupe TVA inc. (e) |
13 |
Viewers' Choice Canada Inc., Cogeco Radio-Télévision inc., TQS inc. and/et TVA Group Inc./Groupe TVA inc. (e) |
14 |
Joule Media Inc. |
15 |
Viewers' Choice Canada Inc. |
16 |
Viewers' Choice Canada Inc. |
17 |
Paradise Broadcasting Corporation |
18 |
Aylmer and Area Inter-Mennonite Community Council |
19 |
Belleville Radio Limited (CJOJ-FM) |
20 |
CHUM Limited (CFJR) |
21 |
572047 Ontario Limited (CHUC) |
22 |
Gary Hooper (World Youth Day event) (e) |
23 |
Radio Western Inc. (CHRW-FM) |
24 |
Télémédia Radio (Québec) inc. |
25 |
Rogers Broadcasting Limited |
26 |
Telus Entertainment Inc. (e) |
27 |
Christian Youth Centre (Kingston) |
(e) applications filed electronically |
|
PREAMBLE |
|
At the 6 May 2002 public hearing the Commission will examine applications to renew the licences of 7 local television stations owned by CHUM Limited (CHUM). In Public Notice CRTC 1999-97: Building on Success - A Policy Framework for Canadian Television (TV Policy), the Commission announced that it would begin renewing all of the conventional licences held or controlled by a multi-station ownership group at the same time. Multi-station ownership groups exist where more than one conventional television station is owned or controlled by the same person or entity. The first of such groups to be renewed were the "large ownership groups" - those licensed to operate in several provinces with a potential reach of more than 70% of the audience in their language of operation - CTV Television Inc. (Decision CRTC 2001-457) and Global Television Network Ltd. (Decision CRTC 2001-458) renewed in 2001. In this proceeding, the Commission will consider how to address CHUM as a multi-station ownership group in light of the TV Policy. |
|
In the TV Policy, the Commission pointed out that the smaller station groups, like CHUM, generally offer program schedules that differ from those of the largest groups. Further, the smaller groups were encouraged to remain distinctive and to experiment with new genres of Canadian programming and new ways of meeting the needs of their audiences. The TV Policy provided flexibility in that regard. |
|
Under the TV Policy, the Commission will consider a multi-station group's corporate strategy, the methods of implementation of that strategy by individual stations, and the contributions of all aspects of a licensee's operations to the broadcasting system. While the Commission does not necessarily entertain the renewal of specialty service licences at the same time as a multi-station group's conventional licences, it will take into account such group holdings in evaluating and renewing a group's conventional licences. |
|
In addition to its six conventional television licenses in Ontario, CHUM recently became the licensee of two conventional television stations in British Columbia. CHUM was awarded a new licence for CIVI-TV Victoria, pursuant to Decision CRTC 2000-219. CHUM Limited also acquired the Vancouver station CKVU-TV from CanWest Television Inc., which was approved pursuant to Decision CRTC 2001-647. While the CKVU-TV licence will be considered for renewal at this proceeding, the CIVI-TV licence will not. |
|
CHUM also has ownership interests in nine analogue programming undertakings, three Category 1 digital specialty programming services, and nineteen Category 2 digital specialty programming undertakings (to date five of these Category 2 services have been launched). |
|
Guided by the flexible framework that the TV Policy provides, the Commission intends to consider the following issues, among others, at the hearing: |
|
a) Group Synergies |
|
Under the TV Policy, the Commission takes into account all of a group's holdings in evaluating and renewing a group's conventional licences. The Commission intends to pursue questions such as: |
|
|
|
b) Peak Time and Priority Programming Strategies |
|
The TV Policy broadened the definition of what it now terms "priority programming". The policy also introduced more flexibility for broadcasters to address the needs and expectations of Canadian audiences and to provide high-quality and diverse Canadian programming in peak time. The Commission intends to pursue questions such as: |
|
|
|
|
|
c) Regional Reflection |
|
In the TV Policy, it was noted that audiences have a strong desire for a better reflection of Canada's regions to the country as a whole. Given that CHUM currently holds conventional television licences in two provinces, the Commission intends to pursue questions such as: |
|
|
|
|
|
d) Local Reflection |
|
While the Commission no longer requires applicants to make quantitative commitments to local news programs, the TV policy requires all licensees to demonstrate how they will meet the demands and reflect the particular concerns of their local audiences, whether through local news or other local programming. The Commission intends to pursue questions such as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e) Cultural Diversity |
|
Under the TV Policy, conventional television licensees are expected at licence renewal, to make specific commitments to initiatives designed to ensure that they contribute to a system that more accurately reflects the presence of cultural and racial minorities and Aboriginal peoples in the communities they serve. Licensees are expected to ensure that the on-screen portrayal of all minority groups is accurate, fair and non-stereotypical. The Commission intends to pursue questions such as: |
|
|
|
|
|
f) Service to the Visually Impaired |
|
The TV Policy provides that the Commission, at licence renewal, will explore with licensees the progress that has been made in meeting the needs of the visually impaired. The Commission intends to pursue questions such as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g) Vertical Integration |
|
In the Commission's renewal decisions for CanWest Global and CTV (Decisions CRTC 2001-458 and Decision CRTC 2001-457 respectively), the Commission expected both licensees to ensure that at least 75% of all Canadian priority programming broadcast by the licensee on average over the broadcast year is produced by independent production companies. Affiliated production companies are considered by the Commission to be those in which a licensee, and any company related to the licensee, owns in aggregate a 30% or greater equity interest. CHUM has a 40% ownership interest in a production company. As such, the Commission intends to consider the following: |
|
|
|
h) CHUM |
|
CHRO-TV Split Feed Application |
|
|
|
1. |
Barrie, Ontario (e) |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to renew the licence of television station CKVR-TV Barrie and its transmitter CKVR-TV-1 Parry Soundexpiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee is applying to request deletion of its current condition of licence that any non-Canadian feature film broadcast by the licensee in the evening (6 p.m. to midnight) shall be simulcast with CITY-TV Toronto, with the exception of one evening per week. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
2. |
London, Ontario (e) |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to renew the licence of television station CFPL-TV Londonexpiring 31 August 2002. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
3. |
Pembroke and Ottawa, Ontario (e) |
Applications by CHUM LIMITED: |
|
|
|
|
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of applications: |
|
4. |
Toronto, Woodstock and Ottawa, Ontario (e) |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to renew the licence of television station CITY-TV Toronto and its transmitters CITY-TV-2 Woodstock and CITY-TV-3 Ottawaexpiring 31 August 2002. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
At the licensee's address, and |
|
5. |
Wheatley and Windsor, Ontario (e) |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to renew the licence of television station CHWI-TV Wheatley and its transmitter CHWI-TV-60 Windsor, expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
6. |
Wingham, Ontario (e) |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to renew the licence of television station CKNX-TV Wingham expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
7. |
Vancouver and Courtenay, British Columbia (e) |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to renew the licence of television station CKVU-TV Vancouver and its transmitter CKVU-TV-1 Courtenayexpiring 31 August 2002. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
299 Queen Street West |
|
Examination of application: |
|
CKVU |
|
Across Canada |
|
Application by TELELATINO NETWORK INC. to renew the licence of the nationalspecialty television service known as Telelatinoexpiring 31 August 2002. The licensee provides ethnic programming directed to Italian and Hispanic/Spanish audiences. |
|
The licensee proposes the following amendments to its condition of licence number 1a) and 1b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Commission notes that in Decision CRTC 2001-665 it stated that, in the context of Telelatino's upcoming licence renewal, it would be willing to explore any programming concerns which were raised by intervenors, but not dealt with, in the acquisition process. Accordingly, any parties wishing to file interventions with respect to programming may do so in the context of this renewal. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
9. |
Across Canada |
Applications by CABLE PUBLIC AFFAIRS CHANNEL INC. (CPAC) to renew the broadcasting licences of the English- and French-language satellite to cable programming undertakings, expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee's proposal would involve amendments to the broadcasting licence as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The licensee also proposes that none of its programming will contain commercial content, including either commercial messages or sponsorships. The licensee states that the only possible exception might be the inclusion of sponsorship messages in connection with the provision of closed captioning. |
|
The Commission may wish to discuss with the licensee the appropriateness of adding a condition of license that none of its programming will contain commercial content. |
|
In addition, the licensee has proposed that the Commission authorize its service for distribution on a dual status basis. CPAC believes that such distribution status would be consistent with CPAC's public service mandate, as well as with the Commission's policy for the distribution of the proceedings of the House of Commons on CPAC as set out in Public Notice CRTC 2001-115, dated 6 November 2001. Dual status means that, where a service having this status is distributed, it must be carried as part of the basic service, unless the programming undertaking agrees in writing to its service being distributed on a discretionary tier. In considering whether it would be appropriate to authorize CPAC's service for distribution on a dual status basis, the Commission will wish to explore at the hearing and seeks comment on the following options: |
|
|
|
|
|
The Commission invites the public to regularly examine the public examination file of the above noted applications in order to become aware of any additional information that could be filed in the future in response to clarification questions from the Commission. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
CPAC |
|
Examination of applications: |
|
At the applicant's address, and |
|
Rogers Communications Inc. |
|
Shaw Communications Inc. |
|
Cogeco Inc. |
|
10. |
Across Canada |
Application by THE FAMILY CHANNEL INC. to renew the licence of the national English-language pay television service known as "Family" expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee proposes to renew its licence under the same terms and conditions as their past licence term with the following exception: |
|
|
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
11. |
Across Canada |
Application by NETWORK TELEVISION INTERNATIONAL INC. for a licence to operate a national ethnic Category 2 specialty television service to be known as ITBC Television Canada. |
|
The applicant proposes to offer programming targeting the Tamil-speaking community. |
|
No less than 90% of the programming broadcast during the broadcast week would be in the Tamil language. |
|
No more than 10% of the programming broadcast during the broadcast week would be in the English language. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
12. |
Across Canada (e) |
Application by VIEWERS' CHOICE CANADA INC., COGECO RADIO-TÉLÉVISION INC., TQS INC. and TVA GROUP INC., partners in a general partnership, to renew the licence of the nationalFrench-language general interest pay-per-view television service, distributed by cable, known as "Canal Indigo" expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee proposes to renew its licence under the same terms and conditions, as they have evolved with the Commission's authorisation, during the first licence term. |
|
Since September 2001, all feature films broadcast on Canal Indigo are closed-captioned. The licensee is committing to continue to include the closed-captioning in all feature films they broadcast throughout the upcoming licence term. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
13. |
Across Canada (e) |
Application by VIEWERS' CHOICE CANADA INC., COGECO RADIO-TÉLÉVISION INC., TQS INC. and TVA GROUP INC., partners in a general partnership, to renew the licence of the nationalFrench-language general interest DTH pay-per-view television service, known as "Canal Indigo" expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee proposes to renew its licence under the same terms and conditions, as they have evolved with the Commission's authorisation, during the first licence term except for the following: |
|
The licensee requests to remove condition of licence number 11 which currently reads as follows: |
|
|
|
The licensee proposes to remove this condition of licence in light of the adoption of subsection 6.1(1) and (2) of the Pay Television Regulations, 1990 which provide that a licensee will be deemed to give itself an undue preference if it distributes a pay-per-view program for which it has acquired an exclusive or other preferential right. |
|
Since September 2001, all feature films broadcast on Canal Indigo are closed-captioned. The licensee is committing to continue to provide the closed-captioning in all feature films they broadcast throughout the upcoming licence term. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
14. |
Across Canada (e) |
Application by JOULE MEDIA INC. for a licence to operate a national English-language Category 2specialty television service to be known as Fusion TV. |
|
The applicant proposes to offer family entertainment programming including but not limited to interactive games and books. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
15. |
Eastern Canada |
Application by Viewer's Choice Canada INC. to renew the licence of the regional English-language DTH pay-per-view television service known as "Viewer's Choice Canada" expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee proposes to renew its licence under the same terms and conditions of their past licence term, with the following exception: |
|
|
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
16. |
Eastern Canada |
Application by Viewer's Choice Canada INC. to renew the licence of the regional English-language terrestrial pay-per-view television service known as "Viewer's Choice Canada" expiring 31 August 2002. |
|
The licensee proposes to renew its licence under the same terms and conditions of their past licence term. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
17. |
Paradise, Newfoundland and Labrador |
Application by PARADISE BROADCASTING CORPORATION for a licence to operate a not-for-profit English-language developmental FMradio station in Paradise. |
|
The new station would operate on frequency 91.5 MHz (channel 218 LP) with an effective radiated power of 5 watts. |
|
The applicant proposes to offer a variety of music and spoken-word programming of interest to the local community, and to train volunteers in the field of broadcasting. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised by the Department of Industry, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
18. |
Aylmer and area, Ontario |
Application by AYLMER AND AREA INTER-MENNONITE COMMUNITY COUNCIL for a licence to operate a low-power FM ethnicradio station in Aylmer broadcasting only in the German language. |
|
The new station would operate on frequency 107.7 MHz (channel 299LP) with an effective radiated power of 50 watts. |
|
The applicant proposes to provide four hours per day of programming of particular interest to members of the local German-speaking Mennonite community. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
19. |
Belleville, Ontario |
Application by BELLEVILLE RADIO LIMITED to amend the licence of radio station CJOJ-FM. |
|
The licensee proposes to decrease the effective radiated power from 50,000 to 42,000 watts and to relocate its transmitter to a site near Oak Lake approximately 25 km west of the existing site. |
|
The licensee wishes to increase the quality of the CJOJ-FM signal and provide a more reliable signal to its central market of Belleville and Trenton. |
|
The Commission notes that as a result of the proposed changes the station's contours will shift westward from their current location. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
20. |
Brockville, Ontario |
Application by CHUM LIMITED to convert radio station CFJR Brockville from the AM band to the FM band. |
|
The new station would operate on frequency 104.9 MHz (channel 285B1) with an effective radiated power of 5,600 watts. |
|
The applicant is requesting permission to simulcast the programming of CFJR on the FM band for a period of 3 months from the date of implementation. |
|
This application requires the issuance of a new licence. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
21. |
Cobourg, Ontario |
Application by 572047 ONTARIO LIMITED to amend the licence of AM radio station CHUC. |
|
The licensee proposes to change the assigned frequency from 1450 KHz to 1580 KHz and to increasethe transmitter power from 8,000 to 10,000 watts during the day and from 1,000 to 10,000 watts during the night. |
|
The licensee states that the proposed changes will result in a significant increase in the station's night-time "interference-free" service area as well as an improvement in the daytime coverage within its primary market of Northumberland County. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised by the Department of Industry, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
22. |
Greater Toronto Area, Ontario (e) |
Application by GARY HOOPERfor licences to operate 18 low power FMradio undertakings in Toronto during the World Youth Day event being held between July 22 and July 28, 2002. |
|
The programming undertakings would broadcast in the following languages: Aboriginal; Arabic; Chinese; Croatian; Czech; English; French; German; Italian; Japanese; Polish; Portuguese; Romanian; Russian; Slovene; Slovak; Spanish; and Ukraine. |
|
The proposed transmitters would operate on the following frequencies: 89.9 MHz (channel 210 LP); 90.7 MHz (channel 214 LP); 91.9 MHz (channel 220 LP); 94.5 MHz (channel 233 LP); 95.5 MHz (channel 238 LP); 96.9 MHz (channel 245 LP); 97.7 MHz (channel 249 LP); 98.7 MHz (channel 254 LP); 99.5 MHz (channel 258 LP); 100.3 MHz (channel 262 LP); 101.1 MHz (channel 266 LP); 101.7 MHz (channel 269 LP); 102.7 MHz (channel 274 LP); 103.9 MHz (channel 280 LP); 104.9 MHz (channel 285 LP); 105.9 MHz (channel 290 LP); 106.7 MHz (channel 294 LP); 107.5 MHz (channel 298 LP); with an effective radiated power of 10 watts, respectively. |
|
The applicant proposes to broadcast programming of specific interest to World Youth Day attendees. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised by the Department of Industry, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
23. |
London, Ontario |
Application by RADIO WESTERN INC. to amend the licence of radio station CHRW-FM. |
|
The licensee proposes to relocate its transmitter 2.7 km east of the existing site to an office tower located at One London Place; to change the frequency from 94.7 MHz (channel 234A) to 94.9 MHz (channel 235A) and to increase the effective radiated power from 3,000 to 3,500 watts. |
|
The licensee states that the proposed changes would result in a better quality signal to listeners located in the eastern part of its licensed area who are currently experiencing poor reception of CHRW-FM. |
|
The licensee also states that a potential loss of some coverage in the south-western sector of its secondary service area poses no problem for the undertaking. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Licensee's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
24. |
Ottawa, Ontario |
Application by TÉLÉMÉDIA RADIO (QUÉBEC) INC. for a licence to carry on a Transitional Digital Radio Undertaking associated with its existing FM station, CIMF-FM in Hull, Québec. |
|
The undertaking would use three transmitters to be located at the CBC Camp Fortune site (Quebec), CBC Lanark Avenue building and at the Time MCI Las Brisas building, both located in Ottawa. |
|
The new station would operate all three transmitters in a single frequency network, using 1463.280 MHz (DRB Channel 7), with effective isotropic radiated power of 5,928 watts, 2,850 watts and 2,965 watts, respectively. |
|
The applicant proposes initially to simulcast the current programming services in full and subsequently, to provide as many as 14 hours per week of new programming. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised by the Department of Industry, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
25. |
Ottawa, Ontario |
Application by ROGERS BROADCASTING LIMITED for a licence to carry on a Transitional Digital Radio Undertaking associated with its existing FM station, CIOX-FM Smiths Falls. |
|
The undertaking would use three transmitters to be located at the CBC Camp Fortune site (Quebec), CBC Lanark Avenue building and at the Time MCI Las Brisas building, both located in Ottawa. |
|
The new station would operate all three transmitters in a single frequency network, using 1484.208 MHz (DRB Channel 19), with effective isotropic radiated power of 5,928 watts, 2,850 watts and 2,965 watts, respectively. |
|
The applicant proposes initially to simulcast the current programming services in full and subsequently, to provide as many as 14 hours per week of new programming. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised by the Department of Industry, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
26. |
Toronto (CityPlace), Ontario (e) |
Application by TELUS ENTERTAINMENT INC. for a licence to operate anEnglish-language video-on-demand service to serve the CityPlace development in downtown Toronto. |
|
The applicant proposes to offer an English-language, general interest video-on-demand service, composed primarily of feature films. Feature films in other languages may compose part of this service. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
27. |
Westport area, Ontario |
Application by CHRISTIAN YOUTH CENTRE (KINGSTON), doing business under the name and style ofCAMP IAWAH for a licence to operate an English-language FM radio station near Westport. |
|
The new station would operate on frequency 106.3 MHz (channel 292 LP) with an effective radiated power of 0.23 watts. |
|
The applicant proposes to operate only during July and August and offer four to five hours of music and 15 minutes of religious programming per day. |
|
The Commission will only proceed with this application at the public hearing if advised by the Department of Industry, at least ten days prior to the hearing, that it is technically acceptable. |
|
Applicant's address: |
|
Examination of application: |
|
SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL REQUIREMENTS |
|
PERSONS REQUIRING COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT SUCH AS ASSISTIVE LISTENING DEVICES AND SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETATION ARE REQUESTED TO INFORM THE COMMISSION AT LEAST TWENTY (20) DAYS BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE PUBLIC HEARING SO THAT THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE. |
|
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
|
DEADLINE FOR INTERVENTION |
|
The intervention must be received by the CRTC and by the applicant ON OR BEFORE the above-mentioned date. The Commission cannot be held responsible for postal delays. |
|
Your intervention will be considered by the Commission, and will form part of the public record of the proceeding without further notification to you, provided the procedure set out below has been followed. You will be contacted only if your submission raises procedural questions. |
|
Submit your written intervention to the Secretary General of the Commission in ONLY ONE of the following formats: |
|
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL TO |
|
A true copy MUST be sent to the applicant and proof that this has been done must accompany the intervention sent to the Commission. |
|
Where the intervention is filed by electronic means, the line ***End of document*** should be entered following the last paragraph of the document, as an indication that the document has not been damaged during electronic transmission. |
|
Please note, that only the documents (applications and interventions) electronically filed will be available on the Commission's web site. You will be able to access these documents by indicating the public notice or the notice of public hearing number. |
|
Each paragraph of the document should be numbered. |
|
Your intervention should clearly identify the application and indicate whether you support or oppose the application, or if you propose changes to it, include the facts and grounds for your proposal. |
|
In the event that the application is brought to the oral phase of the hearing, and if you wish to appear, you must provide reasons why your written comments are not sufficient and why an appearance is necessary. |
|
Persons requiring communications support such as assistive listening devices and sign language interpretation are requested to inform the commission at least twenty (20) days before the commencement of the public hearing so that the necessary arrangements can be made. |
|
Participation via teleconference |
|
The Commission recognizes that the licence renewals of CHUM Limited's conventional television stations affect a number of communities predominantly in Ontario, but also in British Columbia. There may be parties who wish to comment on these applications and participate in the hearing, but who are unable to attend the hearing in Gatineau. Under these circumstances, the Commission may allow intervenors to present their comments by teleconference without requiring them to file written interventions. |
|
Parties wishing to participate via teleconference must contact the CRTC on or before 11 April 2002 by calling 1-877-249-2782 (toll-free) or for TDD (toll-free) 1-877-909-2782 and providing their name, a brief summary of the comments they intend to present and relevant contact information. Registrants will be contacted at a later date to confirm their participation and a list of teleconference participants will be posted on the Commission's website. |
|
Court reporters will ensure proper transcriptions of the teleconferences and these transcripts will be placed on the public record of this proceeding and on the Commission's website. |
|
EXAMINATION OF DOCUMENTS DURING NORMAL OFFICE HOURS |
|
Documents are available at the local address provided in this notice and at the Commission offices and documentation centres directly involved with these applications or, upon request, within 48 hours, at any other CRTC offices and documentation centres. |
|
Central Building |
|
|
Bank of Commerce Building |
405 de Maisonneuve Blvd. East |
|
55 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 624 |
|
Kensington Building |
|
Cornwall Professional Building |
|
10405 Jasper Avenue, Suite 520 |
|
530-580 Hornby Street |
|
This document is available in alternative format upon request and may also be examined at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca |
|
Secretary General |
- Date modified: