ARCHIVED - Telecom - Commission Letter - 8651-C12-01/01 - Interested Parties to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2001-56 (PN 2001-56) - Operator services - Reverse search directory assistance
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 27 March 2002
Our file: 8651-C12-01/01
To: Interested Parties to Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2001-56 (PN 2001-56) - Operator services - Reverse search directory assistance
In a letter dated 6 February 2002, the Commission invited the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (the Privacy Commissioner) and parties who had participated in the proceeding initiated by PN 2001-56 to comment on the relevance and applicability, if any, of the Privacy Commissioner's report regarding a complaint from Mr. Mathew Englander against Telus Corporation, Telus Communications Inc. and Telus Communications (B.C.) Inc ("Telus").
On 13 February, 2002, the Commission received comments from ARC et al, Aliant Telecom Inc., Bell Canada and MTS Communications Inc., and Saskatchewan Telecommunications. The Commission has not received any reply comments.
On 11 March 2002, the Commission received comments from the Privacy Commissioner in this matter, a copy of which is attached.
In the circumstances, it is considered appropriate to extend the deadline for filing of reply comments to a date five business days from the date of this letter.
Parties are reminded that reply comments must be served, by the filing date, on all parties who participated in this proceeding as well as on the Privacy Commissioner. All documents must actually be received and not merely mailed by the date indicated.
Sincerely,
Shirley Soehn
Executive Director
CRTC Telecom Branch
cc G. Radwansky
- Date modified: