ARCHIVED - Public Notice CRTC 2000-165
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Public Notice CRTC 2000-165 |
|
See also: 2000-165-1 Ottawa, 8 December 2000 |
|
Proposed review of the Commission's position regarding ownership of discretionary programming undertakings by cable broadcasting distribution undertakings |
|
1. |
In its May 1995 Report to the Government (Competition and Culture on the Information Highway), the Commission stated that: |
|
|
2. |
In a number of decisions issued over the intervening five years, the Commission has expressed concern about the potential for undue preference in the analog distribution market, and has denied or placed restrictions on the equity interests held by cable distribution undertakings in discretionary programming undertakings. The decisions include the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
In Public Notice CRTC 2000-6, the Commission issued its Licensing framework policy for new digital pay and specialty services. In that document, the Commission acknowledged the key role that distributors could play in launching new digital services, and therefore announced that it would consider applications for such digital services involving ownership participation by disributors, including cable operators. As part of the licensing framework, the Commission established specific carriage terms for the new services, including measures to ensure equitable terms of carriage for services that are not affiliated with distributors. |
4. |
Subsequently, on 10 November 2000, the Canadian Cable Television Association (CCTA) filed a request asking the Commission to review and amend its current position relating to the ownership by cable distribution undertakings, or their affiliates, of equity interests in discretionary programming undertakings distributed on an analog basis. |
5. |
According to the CCTA, the broadcasting environment has significantly changed, so that it should no longer be necessary for the Commission to restrict cable distribution undertakings from holding or increasing their ownership interests in analog discretionary programming undertakings. In the CCTA's view, such changes include increasing competition, convergence in the communications sector, and the increasingly significant role played by companies having access to multiple distribution and exhibition platforms. The CCTA argues that these justify a revisitation by the Commission of its position on this matter. |
6. |
The Commission notes the following CCTA proposal as one possible means of alleviating concerns about undue preference: |
|
|
7. |
In the circumstances, the Commission considers that a review of its position on cable/discretionary service cross-ownership would be appropriate at this time. Accordingly, the Commission invites comments that address the matters raised in this notice. Without limiting the discussion of these matters, the Commission would appreciate receiving comments on the following questions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call for comments |
|
8. |
As a first phase, the Commission will accept comments that it receives on or before 26 January 2001. |
9. |
This will be followed by a second written process to allow any party to file a reply to a comment filed with the Commission during the first phase. The Commission will accept all such replies that it receives on or before 26 February 2001. |
10. |
The Commission will not formally acknowledge comments. It will, however, fully consider all comments and they will form part of the public record of the proceeding, provided that the procedures for filing set out below have been followed. |
Procedures for filing comments |
|
11. |
Interested parties can file their comments on paper or electronically. Submissions longer than five pages should include a summary. |
12. |
Parties wishing to file their comments on paper should send them to the Secretary General, CRTC, Ottawa, K1A 0N2. |
13. |
Parties wishing to file electronic versions of their comments can do so by email or on diskette. The Commission email address is procedure@crtc.gc.ca |
14. |
Electronic submissions should be in the HTML format. As an alternative, those making submissions may use "Microsoft Word" for text and "Microsoft Excel" for spreadsheets. |
15. |
Please number each paragraph of your submission. In addition, please enter the line ***End of document*** following the last paragraph. This will help the Commission verify that the document has not been damaged during transmission. |
16. |
The Commission will make comments filed in electronic form available on its web site at www.crtc.gc.ca in the official language and format in which they are submitted. This will make it easier for members of the public to consult the documents. |
17. |
The Commission also encourages interested parties to monitor the public examination file (and/or the Commission's web site) for additional information that they may find useful when preparing their comments. |
Examination of public comments and related documents at the following Commission offices during normal business hours |
|
Central Building |
|
Bank of Commerce Building |
|
405 de Maisonneuve Blvd. East |
|
55 St. Clair Avenue East |
|
Kensington Building |
|
Cornwall Professional Building |
|
10405 Jasper Avenue |
|
530-580 Hornby Street |
|
Secretary General |
|
This document is available in alternate format upon request and may also be examined at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca |
- Date modified: