ARCHIVED - Order CRTC 2000-789-1
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Order CRTC 2000-789-1 |
|
Ottawa, 31 January 2001 |
|
Terms and rates approved for large cable carriers' higher speed access service |
|
Reference: Cogeco Cable Canada inc. Tariff Notices 3 and 3A; Rogers Communications Inc. Tariff Notices 9 and 9A; Shaw Communications Inc. Tariff Notice 3; and Vidéotron ltée Tariff Notices 6 and 6A and related agreements |
|
Corrections to Order CRTC 2000-789 dated 21 August 2000 |
|
1. |
Rogers Communications Inc. Tariff Notice 9A should be included in the reference. |
2. |
The appendix of the order is amended as follows and the revised text is in bold: |
Directions to Cogeco, Rogers, Shaw and Vidéotron |
|
|
|
"Nowhere in the tariff or in an Agreement entered into between [name of carrier] and its customer with respect to this service, shall there be a limitation, restriction or other term that is less favourable than the basis on which the [name of carrier] uses its facilities to offer its own higher speed retail Internet Service." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directions to Cogeco, Rogers, Shaw or Vidéotron |
|
a) Cogeco, Rogers and Shaw - Add "validly" before "disputed" in the first sentence of Item 102.7.2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Shaw and Rogers - Amend the definitions of "end-user" to remove the restriction to a residential end-user (Shaw: Delete Item 101.1.2(d) and Rogers: Delete the second sentence and the restriction to the residential marketplace in the first sentence of Item 102.8.4)), make all required consequential amendments and include, at its option, an item describing the access service as being designed for a residential market. |
|
b) Shaw and Rogers - Remove the restriction on use of the access service in relation to end-user telecommuting. |
|
a) Cogeco, Shaw and Vidéotron - Remove terms limiting the types of circuits that ISPs may use to interconnect with the POI. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secretary General |
|
This document is available in alternative format upon request and may also be examined at the following Internet site: http://www.crtc.gc.ca |
- Date modified: