ARCHIVED - Decision CRTC 2000-39
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Decision CRTC 2000-39 |
|
Ottawa, 11 February 2000 |
|
Star Choice Television Network Inc. Across Canada – 199912077 |
|
Application processed by Public Notice CRTC 1999-185 dated 10 November 1999 |
|
Application for temporary relief from the requirements of conditions of licence pertaining to identical programming deletion and for authorization to offer a second set of « 4+1 » U.S. signals as part of a discretionary package - approved |
|
The Commission approves the application for a licence amendment by Star Choice Television Network Inc. (Star Choice), licensee of a national direct-to-home (DTH) satellite distribution undertaking. The amendment grants Star Choice: |
|
|
|
|
|
The text of the relevant licence conditions, as amended, follows later in this decision. | |
Discussion and reasons for the decision |
|
|
Star Choice is currently required to delete programming received by subscribers located within the Grade B contour of a licensed Canadian television station where the programming distributed as part of the DTH service is identical to that broadcast by the station in question, and where there is a request by the station’s licensee that it perform the deletion. |
|
In Public Notice CRTC 1995-217, which accompanied the original licensing decisions pertaining to other DTH distribution applicants, the Commission noted the discussions between some of these applicants and the Canadian Association of Broadcasters (CAB). The discussions concerned alternative measures that could be taken to compensate or protect local and regional television program rights and advertising revenues. The Commission stated that it would accept alternatives to program deletion requirements that were mutually agreed upon by the parties. |
|
A comprehensive agreement, signed 30 September 1999, for the compensation of television licensees has been reached between the CAB and Star Choice, and forms part of the present application. The application itself is the subject of a supporting intervention by the CAB. The Commission is satisfied the agreement constitutes a reasonable and acceptable alternative to the program deletion requirements imposed on Star Choice. |
|
Based on the existence of this agreement and its acceptability, the Commission approves the present application and suspends application of the conditions pertaining to program deletion described above. As requested by the applicant, and in accordance with the terms of the compensation agreement, the suspensions will remain in effect from the date of this decision until the earlier of 31 August 2000 and the date upon which the DTH satellite distribution undertaking operated by Star Choice obtains 500,000 subscribers. |
|
On balance, the Commission is satisfied that the terms of the agreement reached between the applicant and the CAB provide for appropriate compensation to affected broadcasters. |
Licence amendment relative to simultaneous and non-simultaneous deletion |
|
|
Star Choice’s conditions of licence 4b)ii) and 5b) specify that: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Commission hereby amends the licence by adding the following condition of licence: |
|
|
|
This amendment does not alter Star Choice's commitment to honour program substitution requests made by programming undertakings that are carried by Star Choice. As per Star Choice's agreement with the CAB, programming undertakings that are not carried by Star Choice will receive compensation in lieu of substitution or deletion. |
Second set of U.S. 4+1 signals | |
|
The Commission’s current policy generally limits the number of conventional non-Canadian television services delivered by a broadcasting distribution undertaking to one set of the U.S "4+1"network signals. |
|
In its intervention to the present application, the CAB stated that the potential impact on local broadcasters of the carriage of a duplicate set of U.S. "4+1" signals would be mitigated by the following three factors set out in the terms of the agreement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Star Choice notes that Decisions CRTC 98-500 and CRTC 98-501 dated 23 November 1998 granted approval to substantially identical applications submitted by Bell Satellite Services Inc. (Bell Satellite), and considers that approval of this application is necessary to maintain competitive equity between Canada's two DTH providers. |
|
The Commission agrees that, while certain elements of the text of the agreement negotiated with the CAB are different from those set out in the Bell Satellite agreement with the CAB, the Star Choice agreement is materially identical to the Bell Satellite agreement. |
|
The Commission acknowledges the interventions received with respect to this component of the application, including a supporting intervention from the CAB. In its reply to the concerns raised in the interventions filed by the Canadian Cable Television Association, Bell ExpressVu and the Specialty and Premium Television Association, the licensee pointed out that it would be offering a second set of U.S. 4+1 signals for a different time zone. |
|
The Commission is satisfied with the licensee’s reply and notes that the agreement between Star Choice and the CAB provides an appropriate degree of protection to local broadcasters to offset any potential harm resulting from the provision of a second set of U.S. "4+1" signals to subscribers. Furthermore, the Commission considers that approval of this application is warranted in light of the additional benefits that would result, including maximum opportunities for simultaneous substitution and additional choice to subscribers in relation to time zone sensitive signals. |
Secretary General | |
This decision is to be appended to the licence. It is available in alternative format upon request, and may also be viewed at the following Internet site: www.crtc.gc.ca
|
- Date modified: