ARCHIVED - Telecom Order CRTC 99-363
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Telecom Order |
|
Ottawa, 22 April 1999 |
|
Telecom Order CRTC 99-363 |
|
In the matter of the Phase III Costing, Carrier Access Tariff (CAT) and Split Rate Base Procedures Manual filed for approval by O.N. Tel. |
|
File No.: 8654-04-02/98 |
|
1.In the proceeding leading to Regulatory Framework - Ontario Northland Transportation Commission, Telecom Decision CRTC 98-14 (Decision 98-14), 1 September 1998, O.N. Tel was requested to file its Phase III Costing, CAT and Split Rate Base Procedures Manual (Phase III/SRB Manual). |
|
2.On 25 November 1997, following the close of the record of the proceeding leading to Decision 98-14, O.N. Tel filed its Phase III/SRB Manual. |
|
3.In view of this, the Commission stated in Decision 98-14 that it would consider O.N. Tel's Phase III/SRB Manual in a separate proceeding. |
|
4.The Commission also stated in Decision 98-14 that the specific methodology to calculate O.N. Tel's contribution requirement would be determined in that separate proceeding, as O.N. Tel had previously proposed inconsistent approaches for calculating its contribution requirement. |
|
5.On 2 September 1998, the Commission issued Ontario Northland Transportation Commission - Phase III Costing, Carrier Access Tariff and Split Rate Base Procedures Manual and Related Matters, Telecom Public Notice CRTC 98-22 to consider O.N. Tel's proposed Phase III/SRB procedures and the proposed methodology for calculating its contribution requirement. |
|
6.No comments were filed by any interested party. |
|
7.The Commission conducted a review of O.N. Tel's proposed Phase III/SRB methodology and issued interrogatories to clarify various aspects of the company's proposals. |
|
8.On the basis of its review, the Commission considers that, except for the modifications set out in Appendix A, the tariff classifications list in Appendix B and the SRB report formats in Appendix C, the prescribed assignment procedures generally conform to approved Phase III/SRB assignment methodology. |
|
9.The Commission also considers that similar Phase III/SRB processes that apply to other regulated Canadian carriers should also apply to O.N. Tel, e.g., the filing of Phase III/SRB Manual and Accounting Manual updates. |
|
10.The company is notified that, with respect to the Phase III Manual review process as set out in Bell Canada and British Columbia Telephone Company - Phase III Manuals: Compliance With CRTC Telecom Public Notice 1986-54 and Telecom Order CRTC 86-516, Telecom Decision CRTC 88-7, 6 July 1988, Commission staff may conduct periodic reviews of the procedures contained in O.N. Tel's Phase III/SRB Manual as considered necessary. |
|
11.The company is also notified that it will be expected to submit forecast results in accordance with the process to be established by the Commission pertaining to the company's annual contribution proceeding. |
|
12.In light of the foregoing, the Commission hereby orders that: |
|
a) O.N. Tel's Phase III/SRB Manual is |
|
b) The company file its amended Manual pages, serving copies on all interested parties, by 21 June 1999. |
|
c) The company file its Phase III/SRB unaudited results by 30 September 1999. |
|
d) The company implement the Phase III/SRB update process established in Price Cap Regulation and Related Issues, Telecom Decision CRTC 97-9, 1 May 1997 (Decision 97-9), with the first update due no later than 31 March 2000. |
|
e) The company file its most recent Accounting Manual by 21 June 1999 and file annual updates to this manual in accordance with the procedures established in Decision 97-9, with the first update due no later than 31 March 2000. |
|
Secretary General |
|
This document is available in alternative format upon request and may also be viewed at the following Internet site: www.crtc.gc.ca |
|
APPENDIX A |
|
1.Broad Service Category (BSC) Definitions |
|
1) Revise the company's definitions of its Access and Terminal BSCs so that all Customer Provided Equipment (CPE) provided on a monopoly basis is included in the Utility segment and not in the Competitive segment consistent with approved Phase III costing principles set out for the Access and Terminal BSCs in Telecom Order CRTC 86-516, 28 August 1986 and in Review of Phase III of the Cost Inquiry, Telecom Decision CRTC 94-24, 18 November 1994. |
|
2. Revenues and Other Income |
|
1) Remove the CPE (account 5050), that includes revenues provided on a monopoly basis, i.e., two-party lines, pay phones and inside wiring, from the Terminal BSC and assign them to the Access BSC as part of the Utility segment. |
|
2) Include a description of the company's Network Access revenue accounts on page 4-4 of its Manual. |
|
3) Identify local directory revenues associated with the company's own local exchanges and assign them to the Local BSC to ensure revenues are included in the Utility segment. |
|
4) Assign an appropriate portion of uncollectible revenue to the Local BSC based on a representative sample of billing records. |
|
5) Use Average Net Investment Base ratios to assign interest income across all BSCs. |
|
6) Identify the bundled tariffed services that cause the revenue/cost mismatches and modify the company's methodology to assign the revenues to the appropriate BSCs. |
|
7) Include a table that maps all of the company's tariffed services with its proposed revenue account assignments as an Appendix to the revenue section of the company's Manual using the table set out in Appendix B. |
|
3. Investment |
|
1) Assign all Local Switch investment to the Local BSC to ensure appropriate costs are reflected in the Utility segment. |
|
2) Assign furniture and office equipment investment to the appropriate BSCs on the basis of salary & wage ratios of the personnel using the equipment. |
|
3) Assign general computer investment to the appropriate BSCs based on the software applications being supported. |
|
4. Investment-Related Expenses |
|
APPENDIX A |
|
1) Assign depreciation expenses to the BSCs as per the company's 25 November 1997 proposal, i.e., in the same proportion as the assignment of the corresponding plant investment to the BSCs. |
|
2) Assign furniture and office equipment related expenses to the BSCs in the same proportion as the assignment of the corresponding investment. |
|
3) Assign general computer related expense to the BSCs in the same proportion as the assignment of the corresponding investment. |
|
5. Non-Investment-Related Expenses |
|
1) Assign all expenses resulting from service order activities, collecting and reporting of pay station receipts, customer account queries, and billing related expenses including postage for the company's own local subscribers, to the Utility and Competitive segments on a 50/50 basis. Refer to Implementation of Regulatory Framework - Splitting of the Rate Base and Related Issues, Telecom Decision CRTC 95-21, 31 October 1995. |
|
2) Use a more discrete assignment methodology for information management expenses, by using either a) Central Processing Unit time of the applications or b) billed operating revenues and computer investment study ratios. |
|
6. Official Telephone Service (OTS) |
|
1) Revise the company's Phase III/SRB methodology to include procedures for developing an OTS adjustment. The revised methodology is to be in accordance with that set out in Implementation of Regulatory Framework for Québec-Téléphone and Télébec ltée, Telecom Decision CRTC 97-21, 18 December 1997. |
|
7. Split Rate Base |
|
1) Split the company's Other BSC into Utility - Other and Competitive - Other using the allocations indicated in the company's response to O.N. Tel(CRTC)20Oct98-103. The Manual is to be updated such that any references to the Other BSC should specify Utility - Other or Competitive - Other. |
|
2) Modify the company's Manual such that CAT expenses are included in the operating expense amounts used to allocate Common costs between the Utility and Competitive segments. |
|
3) Assign costs and revenues for the provision of Access Tandem connection service for interexchange competitors to the Utility segment, once the costs are incurred. |
|
APPENDIX A |
|
8.Presentation of Split Rate Base Results |
|
1) Modify the company's presentation of results format in Tables 9-1 and 9-2 of its manual to reflect the format presented in Appendix C of this Order. |
|
9. Contribution Requirement |
|
1) Modify the company's calculation of the company's contribution requirement by using the Utility segment results following the reassignment of Common expenses to the BSCs and by ensuring that Cellular, Terminal and the Competitive portion of the "Other" category are not reflected in the Utility segment. |
|
APPENDIX B |
|
O.N. Tel Phase III/SRB Manual |
|
|
|
GENERAL |
|
APPENDIX B |
|
O.N. Tel Phase III/SRB Manual BSC Tariff Classification & Revenue Account Mapping |
|
|
|
INTER-EXCHANGE SERVICE |
|
|
|
SRB Income Statement |
|
Utility Segment Competitive Total Company |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
Plant Under Construction |
|
Average Net Investment Base |
|
SRB Capitalization Report |
|
Utility Segment Competitive Total Company |
|
Average Net Investment Base |
|
SRB Rate of Return Report |
- Date modified: