ARCHIVED - Telecom Decision CRTC 99-5-1
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Telecom Decision |
|
Ottawa, 30 April 1999
|
|
Telecom Decision CRTC 99-5-1
|
|
On 18 July 1997, the Société d'administration des tarifs d'accès des télécommunicateurs (SATAT) filed, on behalf of its members, an application to review and vary that part of Regulatory Framework for the Independent Telephone Companies in Quebec and Ontario (Except Ontario Northland Transportation Commission, Québec-Téléphone and Télébec ltée), Telecom Decision CRTC 96-6, 7 August 1996 (Decision 96-6), approving SATAT's final 1995 Carrier Access Tariff (CAT).
|
|
ERRATUM
|
|
Correction to Review of Contribution Regime of Independent Telephone Companies in Ontario and Quebec, Telecom Decision CRTC 99-5, 21 April 1999.
|
|
File No.: 8695-C12-03/97
|
|
The first sentence at paragraph 65 should read as follows:
|
|
With respect to Québec-Téléphone's submission that a blended CAT is already a proven method approved by the Commission for use in Alberta, the Commission notes that it dealt with this specific point in its letter dated 12 September 1997.
|
|
Secretary General
|
|
This document is available in alternative format upon request.
|
- Date modified: