ARCHIVED - Public Notice CRTC 1996-59-1
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Public Notice |
|
Ottawa, 24 May 1996
|
|
Public Notice CRTC 1996-59-1
|
|
POLICY REGARDING THE USE OF EXEMPTION ORDERS
|
|
CORRECTION
|
|
In the third sentence of the second paragraph at page 13 of Public Notice CRTC 1996-59 dated 26 April 1996, the Commission inadvertently named the Province of Saskatchewan as one of the parties whose position, at the 19 February 1996 public hearing held prior to publication of the Commission's policy, was that broadcasting distribution undertakings should be regulated under the Telecommunications Act, rather than the Broadcasting Act.
|
|
The Commission hereby corrects Public Notice CRTC 1996-59 by amending the sentence to read as follows:
|
|
The position taken by Telus Corporation and Thomson Newspapers Company Limited is that broadcasting distribution undertakings should be regulated under the Telecommunications Act, rather than the Broadcasting Act.
|
|
Allan J. Darling Secretary General |
|
|
- Date modified: