ARCHIVED - Decision CRTC 96-97
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Decision |
Ottawa, 4 April 1996
|
Decision CRTC 96-97
|
Northern Cable Holdings Limited
|
Sudbury, Ontario - 950775700
|
Applications to add CITY-TV
- Denied |
Following Public Notice CRTC 1995-84 dated 25 May 1995, the Commission denies the applications for authority to distribute CITY-TV Toronto, received via satellite from CANCOM, on a discretionary tier of the cable distribution undertakings serving the above-noted localities.
|
The Commission considers that the distribution of this signal would not be consistent with the guidelines on the cable distribution of distant Canadian television signals first set out in Public Notice CRTC 1985-61 and reiterated in Public Notice CRTC 1993-74. In particular, the Commission has determined that, in view of the size of the Sudbury and Timmins markets, approval of these applications would have significant negative impact on the revenues and profitability of existing local broadcasting services and, therefore, would not be in the public interest.
|
The Commission acknowledges the opposing intervention submitted by BBS Ontario Incorporated (MCTV Division), licensee of the twin stick operations CICI-TV/CKNC-TV in Sudbury and CITO-TV/CFCL-TV in Timmins. |
Allan J. Darling
Secretary General |
|
- Date modified: