ARCHIVED -  Telecom Order CRTC 95-481

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Telecom Order
CRTC 95-481

Ottawa, 20 April 1995
IN THE MATTER OF applications from resellers of Centrex III Service (Centrex) requesting exemptions from the contribution charges specified in Competition in the Provision of Public Long Distance Voice Telephone Services and Related Resale and Sharing Issues, Telecom Decision CRTC 92-12, 12 June 1992 (Decision 92-12).
WHEREAS, in Decision 92-12 and in Applications For Contribution Exemptions, Telecom Decision CRTC 93-2, 1 April 1993 (Decision 93-2), the Commission set out procedures, criteria and a general framework for obtaining an exemption from contribution payments;
WHEREAS, in Telecom Order CRTC 93-1141, the Commission approved Bell Canada's proposal that contribution charges as specified in Decision 92-12 be applied on each DISA path and each PSTN connection;
WHEREAS, in Telecom Order CRTC 94-310 dated 31 March 1994 (Order 94-310), the Commission indicated that it will give final disposition to each application from a Centrex reseller based on receipt of evidence, satisfactory to the Commission, from the reseller and/or from Bell Canada (Bell), in the forms detailed therein;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Order 94-310, Centrex resellers and Bell filed with the Commission, reseller affidavits and/or carrier verification, as appropriate for their configurations;
WHEREAS the Commission has granted final approval where the application in question has met the evidentiary requirements set out in Order 94-310;
WHEREAS the Commission has deferred the application of Altel Canada as the Commission has determined that a technical audit is required;
WHEREAS the Commission has denied certain applications where it considers that the circuits in question are properly subject to contribution and/or where the applicant did not provide evidence as required by Order 94-310, and in certain cases, where the evidence filed was deficient;
WHEREAS certain applicants have submitted affidavits for which the Commissioner of Oaths, etc., have merely indicated that the document was signed, rather than sworn/affirmed before them;
WHEREAS, in Telecom Order CRTC 94-1339 (Order 94-1339) dated 16 November 1994, the Commission indicated that certain applications were approved subject to the receipt of a sworn affidavit;
WHEREAS the Commission wrote to these applicants advising that their applications, might be denied if sworn affidavits were not received within a certain period of time; and
WHEREAS that period of time has now elapsed -
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
The individual applications that are the subject of this Order are determined in accordance with the rulings set out in the attached Appendix.
Allan J. Darling
Secretary General

APPENDIX

APPLICATION RULING

Affidavit Filed Approved

1. AB Tel Systems of Stouffville (30 May 1994)
2. ACSI Access Calling Service 799, 652, 696 exchanges (7 September 1994); new affidavit required for 359, 793, 743 when in use.
3. AD-TEL Communications of Toronto (12 September 1994)
4. AD-TEL Communications (Halton) of Brampton (filed further to Order 94-1339) (13 September 1994, as amended on 16 November 1994)
5. Business Information Depot (10 September 1994)
6. Call Direct (8 September 1994)
7. Canadian Telephone & Telegraph Inc. (2 September 1994, as amended on 8 February 1995)
8. Captelco Inc. (filed further to Order 94-1339) (single hop circuits co-located with double hop circuits) (and 2 November 1994)
9. CashCom Ltd. (21 November 1994)
10. City Access Telecom Inc. (6 September 1994)
11. Communications Mont-Tel (24 November 1994)
12. Distributel Communications Limited (18 November 1994)
13. fONOROLA (9 December 1994)
14. Freedom Communications Network (22 December 1994, as amended on 13 February 1995)
15. Greater Toronto Telecom (3 October 1994)
16. KIT Communication (13 September 1994, as amended on 26 January 1995)
17. Matri-Comm Marketing Inc.(24 November 1994)
18. Metro Access Ltd. (12 September 1994, as amended on 27 January 1995)
19. MTI Communications (19 December 1994)
20. Niagara Connections (2 September 1994)
21. Nu-Mar (6 September 1994)
22. PacificTel Communications (15 December 1994)
23. Real-Tel Network Inc. (21 October 1994, as amended on 2 February 1995)
24. Rebel Communications (Brockville exchanges) (5 October 1994) (new affidavit required for Toledo, Kingston, Winchester, Knowlton when in use)
25. Stratford Telecom (23 August 94)
26. Stratford Telecom (18 October 94)
27. Stratford Telecom (28 November 94) approval subject to receipt of a sworn affidavit.
28. Techno-Tell Inc. (17 August 1994)
29. Télécommunications Inter-Cité 2000 Inc. (2 November 1994)
30. Trilogic Communication (28 October 1994)
31. VSoft Communications (12 September 1994)
32. 839286 Ontario Ltd. (further to Order 94-1339) (local only PSTN connections)

Denied

33. 839286 Ontario Ltd. (further to Order 94-1339) all DISA paths and interexchange PSTN connections
34. Advanced Network (8 September 1994)
35. Cam-Net Communications Inc. (20 September 1994)
36. CTX Telecommunications Inc. (22 September 1994)
37. Telecommunications Inter-Cité 2000 (filed further to Order 94-1339)
38. Universal Telecommunications of Toronto (13 September 1994)

Pending

39. Altel Canada (further to Order 94-1339, and Technical audit required to verify application amended on 10 November 1994) usage and separation of administrative, single hop, and double hop circuits.
Date modified: