ARCHIVED - Decision CRTC 95-512
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Decision |
|
Ottawa, 31 July 1995
|
|
Decision CRTC 95-512
|
|
Compton Cable T.V. Limited
|
|
Uxbridge/Port Perry, Ontario - 941370900
|
|
Increase to service area
|
|
Following Public Notice CRTC 1995-84 dated 25 May 1995, the Commission approves the application to change the licensed area for the cable distribution undertaking serving Uxbridge/Port Perry by including most of the remaining unlicensed areas within the Township of Scugog and Uxbridge comprising the communities of Greenbank, Roseville, Siloam, Glasgow, Altona, Glen Major and an area north of the Uxbridge township line to include the community of Sandford.
|
|
The Commission notes that the subscribers in the extended area will be offered the same programming services and will be charged fees identical to those in the current licensed service area.
|
|
This approval is subject to the requirement that construction in the extended area be completed and the extended system be in operation within twelve months of the date of this decision or, where the licensee applies to the Commission within this period and satisfies the Commission that it cannot complete the construction and commence operations throughout the extended system before the expiry of this period and that an extension of time is in the public interest, within such further periods of time as are approved in writing by the Commission.
|
|
Should construction not be completed within the twelve-month period stipulated in this decision or, should the Commission refuse to approve an extension of time requested by the licensee, the authority granted shall lapse and become null and void upon expiry of the period of time granted herein or upon the termination of the last approved extension period.
|
|
Allan J. Darling
Secretary General |
|
|
- Date modified: