Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
www.crtc.gc.ca
Common menu bar links
Letter
Ottawa, 9 November 2009
Our Reference: 8663-C12-200907321
BY E-MAIL
Distribution
Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Dear Madams, Sirs:
Erratum
Interrogatories 2 and 3 to:
- Competitors who filed submissions (including those represented by CAIP, QCISP, and Open Source Solutions); and
- Incumbent ILECs and cable carriers outside their territory of incumbency.
Should read as follows:
2. If the CO-based ADSL access service is mandated and offered at a price of i) 10%, and ii) 30% less than the aggregated ADSL access service price, for each of these two price points, provide the company’s retail high-speed Internet service total CO-based ADSL access demand forecast in the areas served by ILEC COs where the company is currently co-located or plans to co-locate, for each of 2010, 2011, and 2012. The response should further identify, separately, the number of ADSL-CO accesses stemming from: i) migration from aggregated ADSL access based customers, with supporting rationale;, ii) migration from copper loop based services, with supporting rationale; iii) new demand from existing co-locations; and iv) demand from new co-locations. With respect to iv), discuss, with supporting rationale, the extent to which, if at all, such demand would be impacted by matters such as internet traffic management initiatives.
3. If the local head-end cable carrier high-speed access service is mandated and offered at a price of i) 10%, and ii) 30% less than the TPIA service price, for each of these two price points, provide the company’s retail high-speed Internet service total local head-end based high-speed access demand forecast in the areas served by cable carrier local head-ends where the company is currently interconnected or plans to interconnect, for each of 2010, 2011, and 2012. The response should further identify, separately, the number of local head-end cable carrier high-speed accesses stemming from: i) migration from TPIA service customers, with supporting rationale;, ii) new demand from existing POIs; and iii) demand from new POIs.
Yours sincerely,
Paul Godin
Original signed by
Director General
Competition, Costing and Tariffs
Telecommunications
Distribution List
regulatoryaffairs@nwtel.ca; bell.regulatory@bell.ca; reglementa@telebec.com; document.control@sasktel.sk.ca; iworkstation@mtsallstream.com; regulatory@bell.aliant.ca; Regulatory.Matters@corp.eastlink.ca; Regulatory@sjrb.ca; marcel.mercia@cybersurf.com; reglementation@xittel.net ; regulatory@distributel.ca; lisagoetz@globalive.com; regulatory@primustel.ca; telecom.regulatory@cogeco.com; regaffairs@quebecor.com; ken.engelhart@rci.rogers.com; regulatory.affairs@telus.com; crtc@mhgoldberg.com; eric@rothschildco.com; gfletcher@incentre.net; berzins@nucleus.com; babramson@mccarthy.ca; regulatory@execulink.com; ctacit@tacitlaw.com; abriggs@cogeco.ca; slavalevin@ethnicchannels.com; crtc@les.net; LBC_Consulting@live.ca; andre.labrie@mcccf.gouv.qc.ca; bob.Allen@abccomm.com; ghariton@sympatico.ca; lefebvre@rogers.com; kirsten.embree@fmc-law.com; bruce@brucebuchanan.net; jonathan.holmes@ota.on.ca; cataylor@cyberus.ca; chris.allen@abccomm.com; regulatory@vianet.ca; piac@piac.ca; tom.copeland@caip.ca ; hemond@consommateur.qc.ca; blackwell@giganomics.ca; jhpratt@msn.com; crtc@paul.ca; pris@pris.ca ; regulatory@lya.com; Rocky@TekSavvy.com ; dmckeown@viewcom.ca; David.Wilkie@tbaytel.com; elysabeth.aguila@quebecor.com
