ARCHIVED - Letter

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Ottawa, 9 November 2009

Our Reference:  8663-C12-200907321

BY E-MAIL

Distribution

Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

Dear Madams, Sirs:

Erratum

Interrogatories 2 and 3 to:

Should read as follows:

2. If the CO-based ADSL access service is mandated and offered at a price of i) 10%, and ii) 30% less than the aggregated ADSL access service price, for each of these two price points, provide the company’s retail high-speed Internet service total CO-based ADSL access demand forecast in the areas served by ILEC COs where the company is currently co-located or plans to co-locate, for each of 2010, 2011, and 2012.  The response should further identify, separately, the number of ADSL-CO accesses stemming from:  i) migration from aggregated ADSL access based customers, with supporting rationale;, ii) migration from copper loop based services, with supporting rationale; iii) new demand from existing co-locations; and iv) demand from new co-locations.  With respect to iv), discuss, with supporting rationale, the extent to which, if at all, such demand would be impacted by matters such as internet traffic management initiatives.

3. If the local head-end cable carrier high-speed access service is mandated and offered at a price of i) 10%, and ii) 30% less than the TPIA service price, for each of these two price points, provide the company’s retail high-speed Internet service total local head-end based high-speed access demand forecast in the areas served by cable carrier local head-ends where the company is currently interconnected or plans to interconnect, for each of 2010, 2011, and 2012.  The response should further identify, separately, the number of local head-end cable carrier high-speed accesses stemming from:  i) migration from TPIA service customers, with supporting rationale;, ii) new demand from existing POIs; and iii) demand from new POIs.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Godin

Original signed by

Director General

Competition, Costing and Tariffs

Telecommunications

Distribution List

regulatoryaffairs@nwtel.cabell.regulatory@bell.careglementa@telebec.comdocument.control@sasktel.sk.caiworkstation@mtsallstream.comregulatory@bell.aliant.caRegulatory.Matters@corp.eastlink.caRegulatory@sjrb.camarcel.mercia@cybersurf.comreglementation@xittel.netregulatory@distributel.calisagoetz@globalive.comregulatory@primustel.catelecom.regulatory@cogeco.comregaffairs@quebecor.comken.engelhart@rci.rogers.comregulatory.affairs@telus.comcrtc@mhgoldberg.comeric@rothschildco.comgfletcher@incentre.netberzins@nucleus.combabramson@mccarthy.caregulatory@execulink.comctacit@tacitlaw.comabriggs@cogeco.caslavalevin@ethnicchannels.comcrtc@les.netLBC_Consulting@live.caandre.labrie@mcccf.gouv.qc.cabob.Allen@abccomm.comghariton@sympatico.calefebvre@rogers.comkirsten.embree@fmc-law.combruce@brucebuchanan.netjonathan.holmes@ota.on.cacataylor@cyberus.cachris.allen@abccomm.comregulatory@vianet.capiac@piac.catom.copeland@caip.cahemond@consommateur.qc.cablackwell@giganomics.cajhpratt@msn.comcrtc@paul.capris@pris.caregulatory@lya.comRocky@TekSavvy.comdmckeown@viewcom.caDavid.Wilkie@tbaytel.comelysabeth.aguila@quebecor.com

Date modified: