ARCHIVED - Letter
This page has been archived on the Web
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.
Ottawa, 28 April 2009
By E-mail
Applicant
Mr. Jean Brazeau
Vice President, Telecommunication Regulatory Affairs
Shaw Cablesystems Limited
Suite 900, 630-3rd Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 4L4
regulatory@sjrb.ca
Respondent
Mr. Ted Woodhead
Vice President Telecom Policy & Regulatory Affairs
TELUS Communications Company
215 Slater Street, Suite 800
Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0A6
regulatory.affairs@telus.com
Dear Mr. Brazeau and Mr. Woodhead:
Re: Part VII application by Shaw Cablesystems Limited (Shaw) seeking an order directing TELUS Communications Company (TCC) to provide Support Structure Service in various British Columbia Communities
On 22 April 2009, the Commission sent out an Organization and Conduct letter to Shaw and TCC, which informed the parties that the Commission would hold an oral public hearing on Monday, June 1, 2009 at 10am (Eastern Daylight Time) to adjudicate, in accordance with the expedited process established in Broadcasting and Telecom Information Bulletin CRTC 2009-38, the dispute between Shaw and TCC regarding Shaw’s access to TCC support structures in the Acquired Systems.
On 23 April 2009, TCC requested clarification with regard to the filing requirements of documents for the record of this proceeding. Specifically, TCC requested whether if a party wished to rely on a previously filed document, it must include a copy of the document in question with its May 7 filing and could not simply refer to or quote from the previously filed document. TCC also sought clarification as to whether Commission determinations, tariffs, tariff filings, and other documentation published by the Commission needed to be filed by a party wishing to rely on them.
To assist the parties, the following clarifications are provided:
1) To the extent that a document is already on the record of the proceeding, a party need not specifically include it as part of its 7 May 2009 filing but, if wishing to rely on it, must identify it.
2) Documentation such as Commission determinations need not be filed. In this respect, it is noted that there was an error in the Commission’s Organization and Conduct letter dated 22 April 2009, which is corrected by way of this letter.
Yours sincerely,
Original Signed By
Gerry Lylyk
Director
Dispute Resolution
CC: K. Taylor, CRTC,
kathleen.taylor@crtc.gc.ca
K. Pickell, CRTC
kevin.pickell@crtc.gc.ca
A. Stewart, CRTC
alastair.stewart@crtc.gc.ca
- Date modified: