Search

ARCHIVED - Decision CRTC 2001-370

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Decision CRTC 2001-370

Ottawa, 21 June 2001

Rogers Cable Inc.
New Brunswick, Quebec and Ontario

Applications processed by Public Notice CRTC 2001-43 dated 19 April 2001

Applications to insert certain promotional material in the local availabilities of U.S. satellite services

1.

The Commission approves the applications for authority to alter the signal of U.S. satellite services for the insertion of promotional material in the local availabilities of those services, by adding the following condition of licence:

The licensee may, at its option, insert certain promotional material as a substitute for the "local availabilities" (i.e. non-Canadian advertising material) of non-Canadian satellite services. At least 75% of these local availabilities must be made available for use by licensed Canadian programming services for the promotion of their respective services, for the promotion of the community channel and for unpaid Canadian public service announcements. A maximum of 25% of the commercial availabilities may be made available for the promotion of discretionary programming services and packages, customer service information, channel realignments, cable FM service and additional cable outlets.

2.

The application numbers and locations served by the cable distribution undertakings affected are listed in the appendix to this decision.

3.

This amendment is consistent with the approach taken by the Commission in Decision CRTC 95-12 dated 18 January 1995.

4.

The Commission reminds the licensee that it is not generally prepared to consider applications to use such availabilities for the broadcast of commercial advertising.

Secretary General

This decision is to be appended to each licence. It is available in alternative format upon request, and may also be examined at the following Internet site: www.crtc.gc.ca

 

Appendix to Decision CRTC 2001-370

 

New Brunswick

 

Allardville

2001-0246-8

 

Bathurst

2001-0247-6

 

Blue Mountain Settlement

2001-0248-4

 

Campbellton

2001-0249-2

 

Canterbury

2001-0250-0

 

Caraquet

2001-0251-7

 

Centre Napan

2001-0252-5

 

Centreville

2001-0253-3

 

Dalhousie

2001-0254-1

 

Durham Bridge

2001-0255-9

 

Florenceville

2001-0256-7

 

Hatland, Sommerville

2001-0257-5

 

Holtville

2001-0258-3

 

Jacquet River

2001-0259-1

 

Juniper

2001-0260-9

 

Kedgwick/St-Quentin

2001-0261-6

 

Lakeville

2001-0262-4

 

Ludford Subdivision

2001-0263-2

 

Ludlow

2001-0264-0

 

Miscou Centre

2001-0265-8

 

Nackawick

2001-0266-6

 

Perth/Andover

2001-0267-4

 

Plaster Rock

2001-0268-2

 

St. Margarets

2001-0269-0

 

St. Paul/Val Richard

2001-0270-8

 

Salmon Beach

2001-0271-5

 

Shediac

2001-0272-3

 

Shippegan

2001-0273-1

 

Temperance Vale

2001-0274-9

 

Tracadie/Neguac

2001-0275-7

 

Woodstock

2001-0276-5

 

Quebec

 

Carleton

2001-0277-3

 

Ontario

 

Bolton and surrounding areas

2001-0239-3

 

CFB Borden, Alliston, Angus and surrounding area

2001-0240-1

 

Erin, Hillburgh, Caledon Village, Caledon

2001-0241-8

 

Grand Valley

2001-0242-6

 

Keswick, Pefferlaw, Sutton, Beaverton, Baldwin

2001-0243-4

 

Orangeville

2001-0244-2

 

Part of Richmond Hill/King City

2001-0245-0

Date Modified: 2001-06-21

Date modified: