Search

ARCHIVED -  Decision CRTC 91-845

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Archived

This page has been archived on the Web.

Decision

Ottawa, 22 November 1991
Decision CRTC 91-845
The Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario)
Barclay, Evansville, Keewaywin, Kashechewan and Kirby's Corner, Ontario - 903252500 - 902629500 - 910485200 - 910484500 - 910019900
At a Public Hearing in the National Capital Region beginning on 8 July 1991, the Commission considered applications by The Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario) for authority to carry on television broadcasting transmitting undertakings at the above-noted locations, to rebroadcast the programs of TVOntario, on the channels and with the transmitter power noted below:
Channel/ Transmitter Power/
Canal Puissance de l'émetteur
Barclay 13 10 watts
Evansville 24 20 watts
Keewaywin 2 5 watts
Kashechewan 2 5 watts
Kirby's Corner 30 40 watts
In accordance with Public Notice CRTC 1991-63 entitled New Broadcasting Act - Amendments to Classes of Licence, the Commission approves the applications and amends the licence for CICA-TV, by authorizing the licensee to add a transmitter at each of the above-noted locations. This approval is subject to the requirement that, at each location, construction of the transmitting facilities be completed and that they be in operation within twelve months of the date of this decision or, where the applicant applies to the Commission within this period and satisfies the Commission that it cannot complete implementation before the expiry of this period and that an extension is in the public interest, within such further periods of time as may be approved in writing by the Commission.
Should the Commission refuse to approve an extension of time requested by the licensee, the authority granted for the transmitter in question shall lapse and become null and void upon termination of the last approved extension period.
In accordance with subsection 22(1) of the Broadcasting Act, the Commission will only issue the licence amendment, and the authority granted herein may only be implemented at such time as written notification is received from the Department of Communications that it will issue an amendment to the Broadcasting Certificate.
Allan J. Darling
Secretary General

Date modified: