2010-09-13 - #: 8662-B2-201014638 - Bell Canada - Demande de révision, d'annulation et de modification de la décision 2010-637 (concernant les erreurs dans le calcul du montant récurrent et des intérêts servant à établir le solde cumulé du compte de report de Bell Canada)
Déposer en utilisant les services en ligne
2011-03-04 - Ordonnances de télécom CRTC 2011-156 Demande d’adjudication de frais concernant la participation du Centre pour la défense de l’intérêt public à l’instance qui a mené à la décision de télécom 2010-805
Numéros de dossiers : 8662-B2-201014638, 8662-B2-201014646 et 4754-375.
2010-10-29 - Décision de télécom CRTC 2010-805 Bell Canada – Demandes de révision et de modification de certaines conclusions tirées dans la décision de télécom 2010-637 concernant l’utilisation de la technologie sans fil d’accès haute vitesse par paquets et le solde du compte de report
Numéros de dossiers : 8662-B2-201014638 et 8662-B2-201014646
2010-11-04 - Public Interest
Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: This is an application for costs and taxation thereof, made on behalf of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) in respect of their participation in the above-noted proceeding.
Document: 1460375.pdf - 207KO
2010-10-08 - Bell Canada
Description: In accordance with a 16 September 2010 procedural directive from Commission staff as affirmed by a Commission decision dated 1 October 2010, Bell Canada (Bell or the Company) hereby provides its reply comments in respect of the above-captioned application to review and vary the Commission’s determinations in Decision 2010-637 regarding the requirement for Bell Canada and Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) (collectively, the Companies) regarding errors in the calculation of the deferral account recurring amount and interest and the allowable costs Bell is permitted to claim associated with the administration of a rebate program (the Deferral Account Balance Application).
Document: 1450387.zip -39 KO
2010-10-04 - Quebecor Media inc., en son nom et celui de Vidéotron ltée
Description: Conformément aux procédures énoncées dans la lettre du Conseil du 16 septembre 2010, QMI, en son nom et celui de sa filiale à part entière Vidéotron, soumet par la présente ses observations sur le sujet mentionné en rubrique.
Document: 1447864.pdf - 90KO
2010-10-04 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of an application filed by Bell Canada pursuant to section 62 of the Telecommunications Act and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure dated 13 September 2010 to review and vary Telecom Decision CRTC 2010-637 (“Decision 2010-637”). In accordance with the Commission staff letter dated 16 September 2010, TELUS files the following comments.
Document: 1447858.pdf - 22KO
2010-10-04 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a Part VII application submitted by Bell Canada (Bell) requesting that the Commission review and vary certain aspects of Decision 2010-6371 concerning calculations affecting Bell’s deferral account. MTS Allstream provides these comments in accordance with the process outlined by Commission staff in a letter dated 16 September 2010.
Document: 1447831.pdf - 61KO
2010-10-04 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications (“Rogers”) is filing these comments in accordance with the procedures established by Commission staff's letter of 16 September 2010 regarding the Part VII Review and Vary application (‘the Application”) concerning the “Interest Calculation” in Telecom Decision 2010-637 (“CRTC 2101-637”) filed by Bell Aliant/Bell Canada (“Bell”) dated September 13, 2010. Rogers submits that the application should be denied.
Document: 1447753.pdf - 56KO
2010-10-04 - Public Interest
Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: Pursuant to the procedural requirements set out in the within proceeding, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) files its comments with respect to the review and vary application of Bell Canada regarding the determinations of the Commission regarding the use of deferral account funds to expand broadband services using Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology. The decision to direct that the Bell companies provide their broadband proposal through the use of DSL technology is termed by Bell Canada the “DSL Directive”.
Document: 1447661.zip - 159KO
2010-10-04 - Bragg Communications Inc., operating as EastLink
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as “EastLink” (EastLink), hereby files comments relating to the application filed by Bell Canada (Bell) regarding Telecom Decision CRTC 2010- 637 (the Decision, or, TD 2010-637) on September 13, 2010. Bell’s application is comprised of two parts. In the first part, Bell seeks to review and vary the Commission’s determination regarding the calculation of the recurring amount and interest accrued in Bell’s accumulated deferral account balance. In the second part, which Bell describes as a new application, Bell seeks a variation of the allowable drawdown associated with the cost of issuing customer rebates. EastLink’s failure to comment specifically on any issue raised in Bell’s application should not be interpreted as agreement or support of Bell’s position with respect to those issues.
Document: 1447692.pdf - 93KO
Description: Bell Canada (or the Company) is in receipt of a 28 September 2010 letter from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) objecting to the truncated processes established under a 16 September 2010 Commission staff letter (the 16 September Process Letter) in respect of the above-referenced Bell Canada review and vary applications (i.e., the Deferral Account Balance Application and the DSL Technology Application).
Document: 1445517.doc - 54KO
2010-09-28 - Public Interest
Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
Description: Further to the Commission staff’s proposed process letter issued 16 September 2010, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre writes to the Commission to request a reconsideration of this process change and a confirmation of the 30 day comment period normally provided for answers to Part VII applications.
Document: 1445323.pdf - 26KO
2010-09-13 - Bell Canada
Description: This application is filed by Bell Canada (Bell or the Company) pursuant to section 62 of the Telecommunications Act (the Act) and Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure (the Rules). In this application, the Company seeks a Review and Variance of the Commission's determination regarding errors in the calculation of the recurring amount and interest in determining Bell Canada's accumulated deferral account balance.
Document: 1439059.zip - 550KO
Mise à jour : 2010-03-04
- Date de modification :