Follow-up to Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76: 8638-C12-80/02

Regulatory safeguards with respect to incumbent affiliates, bundling by Bell Canada and related matters - Tariff Issues


Reference:  8740-B20-751/03; 8740-B20-752/03; 8740-B20-754/03; 8740-B20-755/03; 8740-B20-756/03; 8740-B20-758/03; 8740-B20-759/03; 8740-B20-760/03; 8740-B20-761/03; 8740-B20-762/03; 8740-B20-763/03; 8740-B20-764/03; 8740-B20-765/03; 8740-B20-767/03; 8740-B20-768/03; 8740-B20-769/03; 8740-B20-770/03; 8740-B20-772/03; 8740-B20-773/03; 8740-B20-774/038740-B2-6723/03; 8740-B2-6724/03; 8740-B2-6725/03; 8740-B2-6726/03; 8740-B2-6732/03; 8740-B2-6733/03; 8740-B2-6734/03; 8740-B2-6735/03; 8740-B2-6736/03; 8740-B2-6740/03


2005-07-29 - Telecom Order CRTC 2005-284 - mission denies an application by Bell Canada dated 17 March 2003, amended on 30 June 2003, 30 September 2003 and 23 October 2003, related to services provided under customer specific arrangements contract numbers P3A-20 and P3A-21 and directs the company to apply General Tariff item 5030, High Speed Metro service, for the facilities offered under these contracts, effective 10 July 2003. Reference: TNs 6736, 6736A, 6736B and 6736C.

2003/09/23 - Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-63  Review of Bell Canada's customer specific arrangements filed pursuant to Telecom Decision 2002 76. The Commission finds that the tariffs accompanying the customer specific arrangements (CSAs) filed by Bell Canada pursuant to the Commission's direction in Regulatory safeguards with respect to incumbent affiliates, bundling by Bell Canada and related matters, Telecom Decision CRTC 2002 76, do not meet the Commission's requirements in regard to the rates, terms and conditions that should be publicly available in the tariffs. The Commission sets out the criteria in regard to the level of detail that Bell Canada must provide in the tariffs accompanying CSAs and directs Bell Canada to resubmit the proposed tariffs for approval. Reference: TNs 751, 752, 754, 754A, 755, 755A, 756, 757, 758, 758A, 759, 760, 762, 762A, 764, 765, 767, 769, 769A, 770, 771, 772, 774, 780, 781, 786, 787, 788, 789, 6732, 6733, 6734, 6735, 6736, 6736A, 6740, 6740A and 8638-C12-80/02. (.pdf)


2004/03/22 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-63 (the Decision), dated 23 September 2003, at paragraph 91, the Commission directed the Company to address five Customer Specific Arrangements (CSAs) identified in the Decision within 90 days of the Decision.
Document: 040322.zip - 34KB

2003/12/22 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-63 (the Decision), dated 23 September 2003, at paragraph 91, the Commission directed the Company to address five Customer Specific Arrangements (CSAs) identified in the Decision within 90 days of the Decision.
Document: 031222.zip - 32KB

2003/07/23 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Follow-up to Decision 2002-76 - Further to a request from Bell Canada for an extension

2003/07/23 - Bell Canada
Description: The following is in response to your letter dated 2 June 2003, in which you request further details in respect of various contracts listed in Appendices A and B of Decision 2002-76. Specifically, Bell Canada identified, in its letter of 27 January 2003, that 40 of the contracts listed in Appendices A and B of Decision 2002-76 did not require a tariff filing.
Document: 030723_1.zip - 33KB

2003/07/15 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada is in receipt of a Commission staff letter dated 10 July 2003 requesting Bell Canada to file tariffs associated with its High Speed Access (HSA) and Gateway Access Service (GAS) within 10 days.
Document: 030715.doc - 63KB

2003/07/10 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description:  Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Follow-up to Decision 2002-76

2003/06/30 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (the Company) is in receipt of the Commission's 20 June 2003 letter concerning the above referenced proceeding in which the Commission posed a number of questions relating to certain contracts for the supply of private fibre-based networks (i.e., contracts #P3A-4, and #P3A-5) that the Company submitted do not require tariffs in its 17 March 2003 letter.
Document: 030630_1.doc - 81KB

2003/06/30 - Bell Canada
Description: In its letter dated 13 May 2003, the Commission requested that Bell Canada file a proposed tariff and imputation test associated with contract #5 identified in paragraph 74(a) of Decision 2002-76.
Document: 030630.zip - 33KB

2003/06/20 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Follow-up to Decision 2002-76 - Bell est demandé de fournir les réponses aux questions

2003/06/03 - Bell Canada
Description:  In its letter, dated 13 May 2003, the Commission requested that Bell Canada file a proposed tariff and imputation test associated with contract #30 identified in paragraph 74(a) of Decision 2002-76
Document: 030603.pdf - 99KB

2003/06/02 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Follow-up to Decision 2002-76

2003/05/26 - Bell Canada
Description: In response to the Commission's letter dated 12 May 2003 regarding the above subject, Bell Canada is submitting its responses to staff questions which are included as an attachment to this letter.
Document: 030526.zip - 42KB

2003/05/13 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Re: Follow-up to Decision 2002-76

2003/05/12 - Commission Letter - English Version Only - "Hard Copy Document"
Description: Letter addressed to Bell Canada - Subject: Questions related to Bell Canada P1, P2 and P3 Customer Specific Arrangement (CSA) contracts

2003/03/27 - AT&T Canada
Description: These comments are submitted by AT&T Canada Corp., (collectively, the Competitors) in reply to correspondence dated 10 March 2003 from Bell Canada and TELUS Communications Inc. (collectively, the Incumbents).
Document: 030327.doc - 104KB

2003/03/17 - Bell Canada
Description: This letter will identify, for the Commission's information, certain contracts provided to the Commission with the Company's letter on this subject dated 27 January 2003, that, upon further analysis, do not require the approval of tariffs pursuant to paragraph 74(c) of Decision 2002-76 (the Decision) and, hence, should not have been filed.
Document: 030317.zip - 38KB

2003/03/10 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada's response to AT&T et al's comments and comments from Mr. Francois Menard Re: Associated with Tariff Requirements Pursuant to Decision 2002-76.
Document: 030310.zip - 65KB

2003/03/10 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: This letter constitutes TELUS' comments in respect of item (i), above
Document: 030310.doc - 56KB

2003/03/06 - Saskatchewan Communications (SaskTel)
Description: SaskTel is in receipt of a letter dated 21 February 2003 from AT&T Canada et al in reference to the follow-up proceedings to the above mentioned Decisions. SaskTel is also in receipt of additional comments filed on 27 February 2003 by François Menard in this regard. The following are SaskTel's comments with respect to these letters
Document: 030306.doc - 59KB

2003/03/03 - AT&T Canada
Description: The following comments are filed by AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company and Call-Net Enterprises Inc. and its affiliate, Sprint-Canada Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) and are further to the Competitors' submission of 21 February 2003 regarding the above-referenced decisions
Document: 030303.doc - 83KB

2003/02/27 - François D. Ménard
Description: The following comments are filed by Francois D. Ménard in respect of the follow-up proceedings.
Document: 030227.doc - 66KB

2003/02/21 - AT&T Canada
Description: The following comments are filed by AT&T Canada Corp. on behalf of itself and AT&T Canada Telecom Services Company and Call-Net Enterprises Inc. and its affiliate, Sprint Canada Inc. (collectively, the Competitors) in respect of the follow-up proceedings to both Decision 2002-58, and Decision 2002-76.
Document: 030221.doc - 280KB

2003/02/11- O.N.Telcom
Description: On January 7, 2003, O.N.Telcom filed a submission requesting that the Commission require NorthernTel Limited Partnership ("NorthernTel LP") to comply with the determinations respecting ILECs and participate in the activities that ILECs have been required to undertake as set out in Decision 2002-76 (the "Request").
Document: 030211.zip - 967KB

2003/02/10 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directives in paragraphs 36 to 38 of Decision 2002-76, Bell Canada (or the Company) provides the following information regarding the location and operations of the CSG.
Document: 030210_1.doc - 64KB

2003/01/28 - NorthernTel Limited Partnership
Description: NorthernTel Limited Partnership ("NorthernTel") is in receipt of a letter dated January 7, 2003, filed by O.N.Telcom in which it asks the Commission to amend Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76.
Document: 030128.doc - 171KB

2003/01/27 - Bell Canada
Description: Please see the attached re: Identification of contracts that are being filed with the CRTC, at this time, without tariffs and imputation tests. The Company will file the required imputation tests and tariff pages as soon as each is completed.
Document: 030127_1.zip - 31KB

2003/01/27 - Bell Canada
Description: Please see the attached re: Identification of contracts listed in Appendix A and Appendix B of Decision 2002-76 that do not require the filing of tariffs.
Document: 030127.zip - 44KB

2003/01/27 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: Responses to directions set out at paragraph 87 in Regulatory safeguards with respect to incumbent affiliates, bundling by Bell Canada and related matters, Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76
Document: 030127.zip - 34KB

2003/01/27 - Bell Canada
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directives in paragraph 86 of Decision 2002-76 (or the Decision), Bell Canada (or the Company) provides in the attached tables information regarding services supplied to certain affiliates as of 12 December 2002.
Document: 030127.doc - 148KB

2003/01/27 - MTS Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the directives contained in paragraphs 39, 87 and 178 of the above-captioned Decision, the following information is being provided on behalf of MTS Communications Inc. ("MTS")
Document: 030127.doc - 732KB

2003/01/27 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications ("SaskTel")
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications ("SaskTel") has received Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76 ("Decision 2002-76" or the "Decision") and hereby responds to the Commission's requests in the Decision.
Document: 030127.doc - 75KB

2003/01/27 - TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc.
Description: Conformément aux dispositions relatives à la décision Télécom CRTC 2002-76 qui réaffirme et renforce les mesures de protection en faveur d'une concurrence équitable et durable, TELUS Communications (Québec) Inc., vous soumet ci-joint les réponses aux questions lui étant soumises.
Document: 030127.zip - 39KB

2003/01/27 - Aliant Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the Commission's directives in Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76 ("Decision 2002-76") the following constitutes the reply of Aliant Telecom Inc. ("Aliant Telecom" or "the Company").
Document: 030127.doc - 293KB

2003/01/27 - TELUS Communications Inc.
Description: In Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76 ("Decision 2002-76") at paragraph 39, the Commission directed TELUS Communications Inc. ("TCI" or the "Company").
Document: 030127.doc - 58KB

2003/01/07 - O.N.Telcom
Description: O.N.Telcom has had an opportunity to review the Commission's findings and directives in Regulatory safeguards with respect to incumbent affiliates, bundling by Bell Canada and related matters, Telecom Decision CRTC 2002-76, December 12, 2002.
Document: 030107.doc - 42KB


Date modified: