ARCHIVED -  Telecom Order CRTC 98-680

This page has been archived on the Web

Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. Archived Decisions, Notices and Orders (DNOs) remain in effect except to the extent they are amended or reversed by the Commission, a court, or the government. The text of archived information has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Changes to DNOs are published as “dashes” to the original DNO number. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats by contacting us.

Telecom Order

Ottawa, 10 July 1998
Telecom Order CRTC 98-680
On 19 March 1998, Bell Canada (Bell) filed Tariff Notice 6198 (TN 6198) to introduce the Essentials option for Centrex III service in the company's General Tariff Item 680. Interventions were received from Municipal Telecommunications Inc., London Telecom Network Inc. and Optel Communications Corp. Bell filed imputation tests for this service on 12 and 26 May 1998.
File No.: TN 6198
1.In its filing, Bell stated that Centrex Essentials is a service designed to meet the challenges of competition in the small business market. Bell stated that the existing small Centrex service offering requires a significant amount of customization to meet individual customer needs, resulting in a complex and expensive set of implementation methods and procedures. In order to reduce these costs and remain competitive, the company proposed Essentials which has a limited set of features, a maximum of 10 locals and integrates access to the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). Furthermore, Bell stated that, for technical reasons, Centrex Essentials would not be available to single and multi-hop resellers.
2.The interveners stated that this service targets resellers and that the features bundled with this service, particularly dial 9 suppression and PSTN connectivity, are prohibitively expensive for the resellers to provide to their customers. The interveners also objected to the provision that disallowed resale of this service.
3.In its reply, Bell presented a table that compares the proposed rates for Centrex Essentials to the rates resellers would pay for similar configurations as part of a regular large Centrex package. As the proposed rates for Centrex Essentials are higher than the typical rates charged to resellers, Bell submitted that the difference will provide resellers with a substantial margin, contrary to their arguments.
4.The Commission notes that the proposed rates pass the imputation test in rate bands A, B, and C, but fail the test in rate band D.
5.The Commission considers that the proposed provision that prevents resale by single and multi-hop resellers is unjustly discriminatory pursuant to section 27(2) of the Telecommunications Act.
6.The Commission therefore denies TN 6198.
7.The Commission notes that it would be prepared to approve a similar filing which is restricted to rate bands A, B, and C, and which is available for resale.
Laura M. Talbot-Allan
Secretary General
This document is available in alternative format upon request.

Date modified: