Government of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

2009-05-08 - #: 8663-C12-200907321 - Notice of Consultation 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

File using the On-line Services


Reference files: 8661-C122-200904286 and 8638-C12-200905010

Notice of Consultation 2009-261 Schedule

Activities

 Deadline Dates

Notice of intention to participate 2010-01-15
Public Hearing 2010-05-31
Submissions 2010-02-08
Interrogatories 2009-07-17
Additional interrogatories 2010-03-01
Responses to interrogatories 2010-04-01 (revised)
Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure 2010-04-09 (revised)
Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure 2010-04-16 (revised)
Request to appear 2010-04-09
Information to be filed pursuant to determination 2010-05-03 (revised)
Final Submissions and comments 2010-06-21

 

List of Related Documents

Section 1 - Commission Documents
a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.
b) List of Interested Parties
c) Correspondence to Parties
d) Interrogatories

Section 2 - Documents from ILECs, the cable carriers, CISP, Cybersurf, Distributel, OneConnect Canada, and Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Submissions
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
    (see Section 5)

Section 4 - Documents from parties
a) Correspondence to the Commission
b) Submissions
c) Interrogatories
d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure
e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure
    (see Section 5)
f) Comments
g) Reply comments

Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

Section 8 - Miscellaneous Documents
a) Costs
b) Others


Section 1a) Public Notices, Decisions, etc.

2010-03-12 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-8 Notice of Hearing
Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261
Changes to procedure
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010, and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-12-23 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7 Notice of hearing
31 May 2010
Gatineau, Quebec
Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261
Changes of date of the public hearing
Date of hearing: 31 May 2010
Registration date for parties who have not already registered: 15 January 2010
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and
8661-C122-200904286

2009-10-27 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File numbers: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010, and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-10-02 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-5 Notice of hearing
11 January 2010 Gatineau, Quebec
Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high‑speed access services
Change of date of the public hearing and changes to procedure
Date of hearing: 11 January 2010
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-09-02 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-4 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-08-12 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-3 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-08-11 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-2 Notice of hearing
7 December 2009 Gatineau, Quebec
Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

Change of date of the public hearing and changes to procedure
Date of hearing: 7 December 2009
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286

2009-08-04 - Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Changes to procedure
File number: 8663-C12-200907321, 8638-C12-200905010 and 8661-C122-200904286


Section 1c) Correspondence to Parties

2010-03-01 - Commission Letter
File #: 8663-C12-200907321
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2010-01-20 - Commission Letter

Description : Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-12-15 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-12-09 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Re:  Organization and conduct of the oral hearing

2009-11-20- Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-10 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-05 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-11-04 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-23 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 , Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-13 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-07 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-10-02 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Re:  Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-09-03 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-08-04 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution list - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Revised process

2009-06-19 - Commission letter

Description: Letter addressed to Bell Aliant Regional Communications, L.P. -

Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-06-03 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to MTS Allstream Inc. - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services

2009-06-03 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to SaskTel - Subject: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services


Section 1d) Interrogatories

2009-11-09 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Interrogatories - Erratum

2009-11-06 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Interrogatories

2009-07-24 - Commission Letter

Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Subject: Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Corrections

2009-07-22 - Commission Letter
Description: Letter addressed to Distribution List - Subject: Re: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services - Interrogatories


Section 2a) - Correspondence to the Commission

2010-03-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the ILECs)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively, the ILECs) are seeking a 10-day extension to provide responses to interrogatories until 1 April 2010, an extension which they propose should apply equally to all parties to this proceeding.
Document: 1366683.doc - 234KB

2009-12-04 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby requests the opportunity to participate in the oral hearing component of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services.

Document: 1330137.pdf - 22KB

2009-11-05 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Distributel Communications Limited has received a number of letters from parties to TNC 2009-261 regarding the scope of this proceeding, as well as a letter from the Commission, dated 23 October 2009, and a letter from Commission staff dated 4 November 2009.
Document: 1317388.pdf - 2128KB

2009-11-03 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a Teksavvy Solutions Inc. (“Teksavvy”) letter, dated 2 November 2009, requesting that the Commission grant Teksavvy and other interested parties the right to pose interrogatories to incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file second round submissions on 30 October 2009.  Primus is also in receipt of the Commission’s notice, dated 2 November 2009, requesting that parties file comments on Teksavvy’s letter by 3 November. Primus hereby files its comments in support of Teksavvy’s request.

Document: 1314377.pdf – 23KB

2009-11-03 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a letter, dated 2 November 2009, from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) requesting that the Commission revise (for the seventh time) the procedure outlined in the above referenced Notice of Consultation (“the NC”) by allowing parties to pose interrogatories to those incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file second round submissions in this proceeding.  SaskTel is also in receipt of a 2 November 2009 process-related email from Commission staff requesting Comments regarding TSI’s request by 2 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, 3 November 2009.  The following comprises SaskTel’s Comments in this matter.

Document: 1314380.doc – 70KB

  

2009-11-03 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy Solutions Inc. (Teksavvy), dated 2 November 2009, in which Teksavvy seeks amendments to the procedure associated with TNC 2009-261.  

Document: 1314494.doc– 99KB

2009-11-03 – TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a letter from TSI dated November 2, 2009 in which TSI wishes for yet another change to the procedure for the proceeding initiated by Notice 2009-261.

Document: 1314497.pdf - 31KB

2009-11-02 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: CISP is in receipt of a letter dated today from TSI requesting that the procedures of this proceeding allow for the posing of additional interrogatories to the ILECs by November 6th. CISP fully supports this TSI Request.

Document: 1314355.pdf– 47KB

2009-10-13 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: Pursuant to the Commission staff process letter of 7 October 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby submitting its reply to comments on MTS Allstream's request for clarification of the scope of the TNC 2009-261 proceeding, in light of the Commission's having neglected to order Bell Aliant, Bell Canada and Télébec (collectively Bell) and TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) to respond in full to questions asked of them by MTS Allstream, regarding alternative solutions to enable competitive Internet service providers to offer alternatives to all of the end-customers that the incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) are able to serve with their retail Internet service offerings.

Document: 1292684.pdf - 57KB

2009-10-09 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1288060.pdf - 98KB

2009-10-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraphs 28 of TNC 2009-261 and 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby notifying the Commission of its intention to appear at the oral hearing scheduled to commence on 11 January 2010.
Document: 1287996.pdf - 57KB

2009-10-09 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, Cybersurf Corp. hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1287989.doc - 50KB

2009-10-09 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, Distributel Communications Limited hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1287984.pdf - 29KB

2009-10-09 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of a letter, dated 6 October 2009, submitted by MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”) requesting that the Commission clarify the scope of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (“TNC 2009-261”) and to direct Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada (together, “Bell”), and TELUS Communications Inc. (“TELUS”) to respond in full to an interrogatory, dated 17 July 2009, posed to them by MTS Allstream. Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission’s 7 October 2009 letter, Primus hereby submits its comments.

Document: 1288364.pdf - 25KB

2009-10-09 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company files its notice of intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence on January 11, 2010.
Document: 1288022.pdf - 21KB

2009-10-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to a Commission letter, dated 7 October 2009, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing comments on a letter dated 6 October 2009, from MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) seeking clarification on the scope of TNC 2009-261, and requesting that the Companies and TELUS Communications Company (TELUS) be directed to provide responses to interrogatories posed by MTS Allstream concerning the latter's proposed non CO-based alternate services.

Document: 1292646.doc - 99KB

2009-10-09 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) is in receipt of a letter from the Commission staff, dated October 7, 2009. In the letter, Commission staff request comments regarding a letter from MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”), dated October 6, 2009, where MTS Allstream sought “clarification” on the scope Notice 2009-261, and requested that TELUS, Bell Canada, Bell Aliant and Telebec be directed to provide full responses to interrogatory ____(MTS Allstream)17July09-2 (the “interrogatory”).1

Document: 1292622.pdf - 26KB

2009-10-09 - Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are in receipt of a letter dated 8  October 2009 from the Cable Carriers (Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (on behalf of its affiliate Vidéotron Ltd.)), which makes two requests related to the requirement to submit further responses to interrogatories by 9 October 2009, as contemplated in TNC 2009-261-5.   The following are the Companies' comments on those requests.

Document: 1288350.doc - 88KB

2009-10-09 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)

Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is in receipt of a letter, dated 8 October 2009, from Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, “the Cable Carriers”) seeking an extension of the October 9, 2009 date for filing responses to the directives contained in the Commission staff letter dated October 2, 2009

Document: 1287853.doc - 67KB

2009-10-09 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, CISP hereby provides the Commission with its notice to participate in the oral hearing.

Document: 1287575.doc - 26KB

2009-10-09 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)

Description: In compliance with the Commission Staff process letter dated October 7 th 2009 inviting comments on the proposal of MTS Allstream to clarify the scope of the proceeding with regards to the possibility of regionally aggregated unbundled DSL services, find enclosed in the attachment, the comments of CISP.

Document: 1287550.doc - 117KB

2009-10-08 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) seek an extension of the October 9, 2009 date for filing responses to the directives contained in the Commission staff letter dated October 2, 2009 regarding disclosure and further responses to interrogatories (the Disclosure Letter).

Document: 1287909.pdf - 134KB

2009-10-08 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) is in receipt of a letter from Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc,, Shaw Communications Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., (the “Cable Carriers”) dated October 8, 2009, in relation to the Commission staff letter, dated October 2, 2009, regarding the disclosure and further responses to interrogatories in the above mentioned proceeding. In their letter, the Cable Carriers requested, among other things, the following

Document: 1287684.pdf - 25KB

2009-10-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby provide notice of their intention to participate in the oral hearing .

Document: 1286587.doc - 83KB

2009-10-07 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261 parties are required to advise the Commission by October 9, 2009 if they request to appear at the hearing. At the present time, key staff are not available to determine whether we will seek attendance at the hearing. As such, we request that the Commission treat this correspondence as a tentative request to appear and we will follow up with the Commission on October 16, 2009 to confirm our intention to appear.

Document: 1286542.html - 3KB

2009-10-07 - Distributel Communications Limited

Description: Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) is in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream, dated 6 October 2009 requesting clarification of the scope of TNC 2009-261. Distributel supports MTS Allstream’s request for clarification of the scope of this proceeding.

Document: 1283508.pdf - 30KB

2009-10-06 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of the Commission's 2 October 2009 letter addressing parties' requests for disclosure of information for which confidentiality was claimed and for further responses to interrogatories filed in the proceeding initiated by TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1283102.pdf - 66KB

2009-09-03 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) seek clarification of TNC CRTC 2009-261-4, issued on September 2, 2009.

Document: 1266357.pdf - 100KB

2009-08-01 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)
Description: CISP is in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy dated July 26, as well as a reply letter from Teksavvy dated July 29 following interventions by several parties.
Document: 1250901.doc - 30KB

2009-07-30 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of the 24 July 2009 letter filed by TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvay) requesting extensive amendments to the procedures set out in TNC 2009-261. Cogeco is also in receipt on the interventions made by the Consumer Groups, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers, MTS Allstream inc., Execulink Telecom inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., with respect to this request.
Document: 1250490.pdf - 19KB

2009-07-30 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) is in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy requesting certain amendment to the process set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (TN 2009-261). Shaw is also in receipt of letters from Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) opposing Teksavvy’s request.
Document: 1250168.pdf - 77KB

2009-07-29 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI), for Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., is in receipt of a letter from Teksavvy requesting extensive amendments to the procedures set out in NC 2009-261.   We are also in receipt of a letter from Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) opposing Teksavvy's procedural requests.
Document: 1250098.doc - 150KB

2009-07-29 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (“MTS Allstream”) is in receipt of a letter from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) dated July 24, 2009, requesting that the Commission modify the procedure set out in TNC 2009-261, as well as clarifying that participants will have a right of cross-examination, together with responses thereto from Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”), Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) and Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”).
Document: 1250012.pdf - 69KB

2009-07-28 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (Teksavvy) dated July 24, 2009 requesting extensive amendments to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261;

Document: 1249700.pdf - 51KB

2009-07-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) requesting that the Commission extend the deadline for responding to the interrogatories submitted pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261) until 11 September 2009.

Document: 1248027.pdf - 61KB

2009-07-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (the ILECs)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Communications Company (collectively the ILECs) are seeking a one month extension to provide responses to interrogatories until 11 September 2009, an extension which they propose should apply equally to all parties to this proceeding. 
Document: 1247958.doc - 114KB

2009-07-23 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission filed by Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) on July 22, 2009 requesting an extension to the timeframe for filing interrogatory responses set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261. Rogers is also in receipt of a letter filed on July 23, 2009 by Bragg Communications Inc. (Bragg) in support of the Shaw request.

Document: 1247956.pdf - 44KB

2009-07-23 - Cogeco Cable Inc.

Description: Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is in receipt of the 22 July 2009 letter filed by
Shaw Communications Inc. with the Commission requesting an extension of the
filing date for the responses to the interrogatories issued in the above-noted
proceeding. Cogeco is also in receipt of a letter from Bragg Communications
Inc. supporting this extension request.

Document: 1247948.pdf - 19KB

2009-07-23 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc. is in receipt of correspondence to the Commission filed by Shaw Communications Inc. on July 22, 2009 requesting an extension to the timeframe for filing interrogatories issued in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261; Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TN 2009-261).
Document: 1247635.pdf - 144KB

2009-07-22 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI), for Videotron Ltd.

Description: Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI), on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) requesting that the Commission extend from 10 August to 11 September 2009 the deadline for responding to interrogatories in the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1247945.doc - 150KB

2009-07-22 - Shaw Communications Inc.

Description: In Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, the Commission has undertaken a review to consider mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services provided by incumbent local exchange carriers and cable carriers. On 17 July 2009, the Commission and interested parties to the proceeding submitted interrogatories.

Document: 1247577.pdf - 86KB

2009-06-11 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., operating as EastLink, (EastLink) is in receipt of a letter filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications LP, (Bell Aliant) dated June 8, 2009 in relation to the above-noted proceeding. In that letter Bell Aliant is seeking clarification that the determinations in that proceeding will apply to Bragg Communications Inc., carrying on business as EastLink (including the cable systems owned formerly by Persona Communications Corp.)
Document: 1223796.pdf - 118KB

2009-06-10 - Bell Canada
Description: Bell Canada (or the Company) is in receipt of a Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) letter dated 8 June 2009 seeking clarification on a matter of confusion arising from a Commission letter dated 3 June 2009 in the above proceeding. 
Document: 1221735.doc - 49KB

2009-06-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant) is writing to seek clarification on a matter of confusion arising from a Commission letter dated 3 June 2009 in the above proceeding.  That letter responded to a request from Saskatchewan Telecommunications that Access Cable be made a party to the proceeding. 
Document: 1219974.doc - 50KB

2009-05-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is writing to the Commission to seek clarification regarding the scope of the proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, 8 May 2009 (Notice 2009-261).
Document: 1148514.pdf - 265KB

2009-05-14 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) is writing in response to paragraphs 14 to 16 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (NC2009-261 or the Notice).
Document: 1129286.pdf - 29KB


Section 2b) Submissions

2010-02-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: After filing its submission pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, 23 December 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) noticed a problem with the footnotes to Annex 3 contained in the report prepared by Towerhouse Consulting LLP (the "Towerhouse Report"), which was included as Appendix 1 to MTS Allstream's 8 February 2010 submission. MTS Allstream is hereby filing a revision to the pages in question.
Document: 1356699.zip - 939KB

2010-02-08 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby respectfully submit these comments in response to paragraph 15 of Expansion of the proceeding initiated by Telecom
Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261-7

Document: 1356584.zip - 128KB

2010-02-08 - Cybersurf Corp.

Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby files the attached supplemental submissions in the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1356457.zip - 77KB

2010-02-08 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 15 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261-7), Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are providing, in the attachment hereto, their initial submission with respect to the additional matters raised in TNC 2009-261-7.

Document: 1356424.zip - 109KB

2010-02-08 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 15 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, 23 December 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits its comments on the matters arising from Order in Council P.C. 2009-2007.

Document: 1356400.zip - 1854KB

2010-02-08 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261-7, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its attached Submission in relation to the proceeding initiated by Notice 2009-261-7. TELUS’ Submission includes three Appendices. Appendix 1 contains Comments from Dr. Robert W. Crandall on certain issues raised in Notice 2009-261-7. Appendix 2 contains a White Paper1 that was filed as part of TELUS’ petition to the Governor in Council requesting the variance of Telecom Decision CRTC 2008-117 and the rescission of Telecom Order CRTC 2009-111. Appendix 3 contains Dr. Crandall’s curriculum vitae.

Document: 1356240.zip - 912KB

2010-02-08 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)

Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Comments.

Document: 1356157.zip - 4588KB

2010-02-08 - Distributel Communications Limited

Description: Distributel's Comments on Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services.

Document: 1356194.pdf - 108KB

2010-02-08 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: Please find attached the Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed pursuant to TNC CRTC 2009-261-7.

Document: 1356209.zip - 301KB

2009-10-30 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in the Commission’s letter dated 23 October 2009 and Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (“TNC 2009-261”), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) hereby submits its comments.

Document: 1314105.pdf – 48KB

2009-10-30 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: Find enclosed the following second round submission of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers.

Document: 1314323.zip– 3715KB

2009-10-30 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd.

Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby file the attached supplemental submissions in the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1314339.zip– 581KB

2009-10-30 – MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 27 of TNC 2009-261-1 dated 4 August 2009, as amended by TNC 2009-261-6, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby submitting its additional submission in the merged unbundling proceeding initiated by TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1311924.pdf – 1,123KB

2009-10-30 – Distributel Communications Limited

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 2 of TNC 2009-261-6, concerning changes to procedure and Commission staff letter dated 23 October 2009, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits its second comments concerning TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1312076.pdf –  52KB

2009-10-30 – Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.

Description: Please find attached the Joint Supplemental Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd., Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed pursuant to TNC CRTC 2009-261 as amended.

Document: 1312182.zip – 433KB

2009-06-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Please find attached the Initial Comments of Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) filed pursuant to paragraphs 19 and 21 of the above-noted Telecom Notice of Consultation. Please note that Rogers’ response to Appendix 2, part c) of the notice is being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd.

Document: 1231943.zip - 147KB

2009-06-22 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: Please find attached the Joint Comments of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively the “Cable Carriers”) filed in response to the questions posed by the Commission in Appendix 2, part c) in the above-noted public proceeding.

Document: 1231772.zip - 169KB

2009-06-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 and Appendix 1 of TNC 2009-261 dated 8 May 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits in the attached its initial submission in the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1231747.zip - 244KB

2009-06-22 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the initial submission & comments of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. in the above captioned proceedings.   Further please find enclosed in Appendix 1 to the attachment a copy of the evidence, which CISP will rely upon, in support of its rationale in this proceeding.   The evidence was prepared by Dr. Stephen Barnes, Adjunct Professor, Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program, College of Engineering , University of Colorado ( Boulder , CO ).   This evidence was prepared on behalf of Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers (CISP) and originally filed with the Commission in March 2007

Document: 1231641.zip (revised) - 623KB

2009-06-22 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd.

Description: Cybersurf Cop. and Alberta 1356382 Ltd. (Cybersurf) hereby file the attached initial submissions in the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1231611.zip - 82KB

2009-06-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , please find attached the submission of Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).

Document: 1231386.zip - 7,332KB

2009-06-22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)

Description: In accordance with the procedure outlined in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the following Comments.

Document: 1231292.zip - 126KB

2009-06-22 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: In accordance with paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009- 261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby submits its initial submission.

Document: 1231268.zip - 477KB

2009-06-22 - Distributel Communications Limited

Description: Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby provides its initial comments concerning Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261).

Document: 1231254.pdf - 72KB

2009-06-22 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation 209-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriatness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (TNC 2009-261), Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (Primus) hereby files its initial comments.

Document: 1231126.pdf - 33KB

2009-06-22 - Shaw Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its initial comments.

Document: 1231116.zip - 282 KB

2009-06-22 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company files its attached Submission.

Document: 1230985.zip - 114KB

2009-06-22 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI), for Videotron Ltd.
Description: QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), is pleased to provide the enclosed initial submission on the issues raised in NC 2009-261.

Document: 1230614.pdf - 171KB

2009-06-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 19 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits on behalf of its subsidiary Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. its initial submission.
Document: 1230618.pdf - 148KB

Section 2c) - Interrogatories

2010-03-02 - Vaxination Informatique
Description: Notice of Consultation 2009-261 Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of
mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services
Document: 1365385.pdf - 166KB

2010-03-01 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc.
Description: Find enclosed in appendix 1 to this letter, additional interrogatories as per the procedures set in TNC2009-261-7 issued by CISP to Incumbent local exchange and cable carriers.
Document: 1365378.doc - 39KB

2010-03-01 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 16 of TNC 2009-261-7, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. is
addressing the interrogatories in the attached appendices to the following corresponding
parties:
Document: 1365362.zip - 84KB

2010-03-01 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedure established by the Commission in the above-noted
proceeding, Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. hereby files its interrogatories
addressed to other parties in this proceeding.
Document: 1365352.zip - 69KB

2010-03-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261-7, please find attached interrogatories from TELUS Communications Company addressed to the following parties:
Document: 1365349.pdf - 38KB

2010-03-01 - Bell Aliant Telecommunications Regional, Limited Patnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 16 of TNC 2009-261-7, please find attached interrogatories addressed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies.
Document: 1365344.zip - 62KB

2010-03-01 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 16 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following interrogatories:
Document: 1365338.zip - 94KB

2010-03-01 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 16 of TNC 2009-261, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the attached interrogatories to the following parties:
Attachment 1: Cable Carriers; Cogeco Cable Inc (Cogeco), Rogers Communications
Inc (Rogers), Eastlink, Shaw Communications (Shaw) and Vidéotron Ltée (Vidéotron) Attachment 2: Bell Attachment 3: Telus
Document: 1365332.zip - 113KB

2010-03-01 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached interrogatories addressed to various parties as listed below, pursuant to paragraph 16 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1365309.zip - 92KB

2009-11-06 – Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 28 of TNC 2009-261, as amended, please find attached interrogatories addressed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).

Document: 1318350.zip – 53KB

2009-11-06 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Companies) submit the attached second round interrogatories addressed to various parties as listed below, pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, as amended.

Document: 1318438.zip – 125KB

 

2009-11-06 – Cybersurf Corp.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 28 of TNC 2009-261, as amended, please find attached interrogatories of Cybersurf Corp.

Document: 1318462.zip – 44KB

 

2009-11-06 – The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)

Description: Find enclosed the following 2nd round interrogatories to the Cable Carriers.

Document: 1318521.zip – 104KB

2009-07-17 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description:  Please find in the enclosed attachment, the interrogatories of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.

Document: 1244833.zip - 16KB

2009-07-17 - TELUS Communications Company
Description:  In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the Commission in Notice 2009-0261, please find attached interrogatories from TELUS addressed tothe following parties.

Document: 1244826.pdf - 111KB

2009-07-17 - Cybersurf Corp.

Description: In accordance with paragraph 17 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Cybersurf Corp. submits the attached interrogatories to each of Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. (on behalf of its affiliate, Videotron Ltd.), Rogers Communications Inc. and Shaw Communications Inc.
Document: 1244812.zip - 49KB

2009-07-17 - Bell Aliant Telecommunications Regional, Limited Patnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the companies)
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TNC 2009-261, please find attached interrogatories addressed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively the Companies).
Document: 1244792.zip - 89KB

2009-07-17 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Pursuant to the procedures established by the Commission in the above-noted proceeding, Primus hereby files its interrogatories addressed to other parties in this proceeding.
Document: 1244771.zip - 36KB

2009-07-17 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)

Description: Bragg Communications, Cogeco Cable, Rogers Communications, Shaw Communications and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Companies) submit the attached interrogatories addressed to various parties as listed below, pursuant to paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261.

Document: 1244756.zip - 144KB

2009-07-17 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 22 of TCN 2009-261, Distributel hereby submits the attached interrogatories to the following parties:
Document: 1244748.pdf - 106KB

2009-07-17 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 22 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, MTS Allstream submits the following interrogatories
Document: 1244733.pdf - 157KB


Section 2d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2009-11-27 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP)

Description: Find enclosed the following deficiency requests for the 2nd round interrogatories of CISP.

Document: 1327321.zip - 128KB

2009-09-15 - Cybersurf Corp.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 24 of TNC 2009-261, Cybersurf Corp. (Cybersurf) hereby submits the following requests for public disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to interrogatories.

Document: 1271691.doc - 78KB

2009-09-15 - Distributel Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out at paragraph 24 of Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261-4, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) is hereby filing its requests for further responses to its 17 July 2009 interrogatories. Distributel has identified three areas where further responses are required:

Document: 1271477.pdf - 37KB

2009-09-15 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the following deficiency requests of the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.

Document: 1271340.zip - 16KB

2009-09-15 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively the Companies) are requesting a number of further responses to the interrogatories the Companies addressed on 17 July 2009.

Document: 1271413.pdf - 107KB

2009-09-15 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Companies)

Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261 as amended, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Companies) submit requests, as set out in the attachments, for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.

Document: 1271487.zip - 82KB

2009-09-15 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, as amended, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files the following requests for further responses to the interrogatories posed to parties on July 17, 2009.

Document: 1271497.pdf - 33KB

2009-09-15 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: In accordance with the procedures identified at paragraph 24 of TNC 2009-261, as modified by TNC 2009-261-4, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following requests for further responses to certain interrogatories identified in the Attachment.

Document: 1271666.pdf - 59KB


Section 2e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure

(see Section 5)


Section 2f) Comments

No documents


Section 2g) Reply comments

No documents


Section 4a) Correspondence to the Commission

2010-03-11 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)
Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter dated 04 March 2010 filed by Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Bell Canada, Saskatchewan Telecommunications, Télébec, Société en commandite and TELUS Telecommunications Company (collectively, the ILECs) seeking a 10-day extension to provide responses to interrogatories until 1 April 2010, an extension which they propose should apply equally to all parties to this proceeding.

Document: 1369100.pdf - 212KB

2009-12-15 - RipNET Limited

Description: Be advised that RipNET LImited hereby withdraws its request to appear the the Public Hearing.  Please confirm receipt of this email.

Document: 1336179.doc - 46KB

2009-11-03 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)

Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009, this letter is submitted by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).

Document: 1314371.pdf - 121KB

2009-11-02 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is making these representations in order to ask the Commission for the right to pose interrogatories to those incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file any second round submissions in this proceeding.

Document: 1314349.pdf - 21KB

2009-11-02 - Execulink Telecom Inc.

Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of a letter from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvy), dated 2 November 2009 requesting the right to pose interrogatories to those incumbent local exchange carriers that did not file any second round submissions in this proceeding.

Document: 1314368.pdf - 23KB

2009-10-15 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, this is to confirm that the Consumer Groups wishes to participate in the oral hearing.

Document: 1296466.doc - 75KB

2009-10-09 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: In accordance with the proceeding schedule established by the CRTC in Notice 2009-261, the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) files its notice of intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1288077.pdf - 117KB

2009-10-09 - RipNet Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, RipNET Limited hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1288069.pdf - 1567KB

2009-10-09 - Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-1, Execulink Telecom Inc. hereby submits notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing scheduled to
commence 11 January 2010.
Document: 1288027.pdf - 21KB

2009-10-09 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)

Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from the CRTC, reference number 8663-C12-200907321, dated 02-October-2009 which addresses requests for disclosure of information for which confidentiality was claimed and for further responses to interrogatories to interested parties filed in the proceeding are to be filed with the Commission, and served on all interested parties, by 9 October 2009.

Document: 1293045.pdf - 245KB

2009-10-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 31 of Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of
mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. hereby provide notice of its intention to participate in the oral hearing.
Document: 1288017.pdf - 16KB

2009-10-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. ("TSI") is in receipt of a submission dated 6 October 2009 from MTS Allstream Inc. ("MTSA") regarding the scope of the above-cited proceeding.

Document: 1288356.pdf - 20KB

2009-10-09 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)

Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream, dated 6 October 2009 seeking clarification of the scope of TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1287965.pdf - 120KB

2009-10-09 - Execulink Telecom Inc.

Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (Execulink) is in receipt of is in receipt of a letter from MTS Allstream, dated 6 October 2009 requesting clarification of the scope of TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1287880.pdf - 76KB

2009-10-09 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is in receipt of a letter dated October 8, 2009 from Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the “Cable Carriers”).

Document: 1287864.pdf - 60KB

2009-07-30 - Accelerated Connections Inc., egate Networks, Managed Networks Services, Telnet Communications (the Competitors)
Description: This submission is being filed by Accelerated Connections Inc., Managed Networks Services, Inc., and Telnet Communications (the “Competitors”).
Document: 1250192.pdf - 161KB

2009-07-29 - RipNET Limited

Description: RipNET Limited (RipNET) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) requesting an extension to September 11, 2009 for the filing of responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.

Document: 1249685.pdf - 1450KB

2009-07-29 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is in receipt of a letter from Rogers
Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) dated July 28, 2009 opposing TekSavvy’s request for changes to the procedure of this proceeding.

Document: 1249666.pdf - 194KB

2009-07-29 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)

Description: The Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”) requesting an extension of (to September 11, 2009) for the filing of responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.

Document: 1248595.pdf - 532KB

2009-07-27 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description: The Consumer Groups are in receipt of a letter, issued 24 July 2009, from counsel for TekSavvy Solutions Inc. ("TekSavvy") requests that the Commission alter the process in this proceeding by: (1) adding a second round of submissions; (2) adding a second round of interrogatories and, (3) permitting cross-examination by parties and the Commission of witnesses under oath at the oral hearing.

Document: 1248578.doc - 124KB

2009-07-27 - Execulink Telecom Inc.

Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. ("Execulink") is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. ("Shaw") requesting a one month extension (to September 11, 2009) to the time that parties have for filing and serving responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.

Document: 1248454.doc - 48KB

2009-07-24 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is in receipt of a letter from Shaw Communications Inc. (“Shaw”) requesting a one month extension (to September 11, 2009) to the time that parties have for filing and serving responses to interrogatories posed by the Commission and other parties on July 17, 2009.

Document: 1248491.pdf - 209KB

2009-07-24 - Open Internet Solutions (OSS)

Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of the 22 July 2009 letter filed by Shaw Communications Inc. with the Commission requesting extension of the filing date for the responses to the interrogatories issued in this proceeding. OSS is also in receipt of letters from both Bragg Communications Inc. and Cogeco Cable Inc. supporting this extension request.

Document: 1249662.pdf - 87KB


Section 4b) Submissions

2010-02-08 - Vaxination Informatique

Description: With this submission, Vaxination Informatique joins 2009-261 public consultation process due to its wider mandate which will help shape the whole ISP industry.

Document: 1356660.pdf - 666KB

2010-02-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Further to the Commission’s directions on procedure set out in Expansion of proceeding initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation 2009-261, issued 23 December 2009 (TNC 2009-261-7), the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”) on behalf of the Consumers’ Association of Canada and Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty Organization) (“the Consumer Groups”) is pleased to provide the Commission with the following comments on the issues raised in TNC 2009-261-7.
Document: 1356649.pdf - 191KB

2010-02-08 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 15 of TNC 2009-261-7, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is
hereby filing the following submissions with the Commission:

Document: 1356611.zip - 4476KB

2010-02-08 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)

Description: This submission is filed by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc. and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”)

Document: 1356541.pdf - 235KB

2010-02-08 - Execulink Telecom Inc.

Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”) is in receipt of Telecom Notice
of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-7 which expanded the proceeding
initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 to
include consideration of matters arising from Order in Council
P.C. 2009-2007.

Document: 1356415.pdf - 107KB

2009-02-08 - British Columbia Broadband Association
Description: The BC Broadband Association (legal registered name is BCBA Broadband Association of British Columbia) is a group of telecommunications service providers, equipment suppliers and infrastructure constructors committed to building and delivering advanced networking services and infrastructure throughout all regions of British Columbia.
Document: 1356217.doc - 99KB

2009-10-30 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors).

Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009, this letter is submitted by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).
Document: 1314204.pdf– 304KB

2009-10-30 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 27 of TNC 2009-261, as amended, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing the following submissions with the Commission:

Document: 1314164.zip – 513KB

2009-10-30 – Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description:  Further to the Commission’s directions on procedure set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-5, issued 2 October 2009, and in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, dated 27 October 2009 at para. 2, the Public Interest Advocacy Centre (“PIAC”), the Consumers’ Association of Canada and Canada Without Poverty (formerly the National Anti-Poverty Organization) (“the Consumer Groups”) are pleased to provide the Commission with the following second-round comments on the issues raised by TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1312100.pdf – 233KB

2009-10-30 – Execulink Telecom Inc.
Description: Execulink Telecom Inc. (“Execulink”) is in receipt of a CRTC Staff letter dated 23 October 2009 which changed the deadline for filing comments to 30 October 2009.

Document: 1312135.pdf – 78KB

2009-06-22 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)

Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is a corporation registered in 2002 in the province of British Columbia and was founded to provide regional Internet Service Providers (ISP) in British Columbia a common voice. OSS primary area of business is providing IP connectivity to various government locations through its shareholders and subcontractors.

Document: 1232479.doc - 197KB

2009-06-22 - ABC Communications

Description: ABC Communications (ABC) has been involved in the Canadian telecommunication industry for 20 Years.  We have built our network using wholesale services from the incumbent British Columbia ILEC, TELUS Communications.   We have found TELUS to be a fair and reliable partner in providing us with the necessary access to provide service to our urban and rural customers.  

Document: 1231980.doc - 46KB

2009-06-22 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)

Description: This submission is filed by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers1 on behalf Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections (collectively, the “Competitors”) in connection with the above-noted proceeding which was initiated by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (“TNC 2009-261”), dated 8 May 2009.

Document: 1232737.pdf (revised) - 188KB

2009-06-22 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), Consumers' Association of Canada and the National Anti- Poverty Organization (the "Consumer Groups") are pleased to enclose their comments on the above-noted matter.
Document: 1230609.zip - 601KB

Section 4c) Interrogatories

2010-03-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: In accordance with the Commission’s directions on procedure in TNC 2009-261-7, the Consumer Groups are pleased to attach the following interrogatory.
Document: 1365293.pdf - 27KB

2009-11-06 – TekSavvy Solutions inc.

Description: In accordance with paragraph 28 of TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. is addressing the interrogatories in the attached appendices to the following corresponding parties:

Document: 1318619.zip – 36KB

2009-08-12 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: On July 17, 2009 interrogatories were filed on behalf of the Consumer Groups re: the above-noted Notice of Consultation.  It has just been brought to our attention that for interrogatory no 1 we anadvertently omitted a date on both the question and on the table.
Document: 1259114.pdf - 48KB

2009-07-17 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description:  With respect to the above-noted Telecom Notice of Consultation, please find attached interrogatories addressed to interested parties, as specified therein, on behalf of Consumer Groups.
Document: 1244886.pdf - 278KB

2009-07-17 - Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Description:  The attached interrogatories are being filed with the Commission in the proceeding conducted pursuant to TNC 2009-261 on behalf of the Teksavvy Solutions Inc.
Document: 1244857.zip - 896KB

2009-07-17 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) for the Competitors
Description:  In accordance with paragraph 22 of the above-referenced Notice, CAIP, on behalf of Acana Inc., Accelered Connection, eagle.ca, egate Networks, Execulink Telecom, MNSi Internet and Telnet Communications (Collectively the Competitors) submits the following interrogatories.
Document: 1244828.pdf - 239KB


Section 4d) Requests for further responses to their interrogatories and for public disclosure

2009-11-27 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is filing its requests
for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to certain
interrogatories.

Document: 1327341.pdf - 39KB

2009-09-15 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre(PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description: The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), Consumers’ Association of Canada and the National Anti-Poverty Organization (the “Consumer Groups”) are pleased to enclose their Requests for Further Responses to Interrogatories in the above-noted matter.

Document: 1271360.zip - 34KB

2009-09-15 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 24 of TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is filing its requests for disclosure of information filed in confidence and for further responses to certain interrogatories

Document: 1271680.pdf - 111KB

2009-09-15 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) for Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Execulink Telecom, Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (the Competitors)

Description: In accordance with the procedures set out in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (as amended), the following requests for disclosure and further responses to interrogatories are submitted by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself as well as Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Execulink Telecom, Managed Network Systems Inc., and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).

Document: 1271719.pdf - 551KB


Section 4e) Responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure

(see section 5)


Section 4f) Comments

Comments received electronically


Section 4g) Reply comments

No documents


Section 5 - Responses to interrogatories

2010-03-01 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups
Description: Please find enclosed:
a) a revised version of Attachment 1 to the Consumer Groups’ 30 October 2009
submission; b) a revised version of Attachment 2 to Consumer Groups(Cable Companies)06Nov09-1 TNC 2009-261; and c) a revised version of Consumer Groups(Cable Companies)06Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1365298.zip - 550KB

2010-02-08 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached response to Rogers Non-Cable(CRTC)6Nov09-10 pursuant to Commission staff letter dated January 20, 2010 requesting public disclosure of the response.

Document: 1356225.zip - 51KB

2010-02-03 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: Inadvertently, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) indicated at page 3 of its supplemental response to interrogatory Cogeco(ConsumerGroups)17Jul09-1, filed on 16 October 2009, that its “Ultimate” High Speed Internet service allows a download speed up to 16 rather than 50 Mbps.
Document: 1354422.zip - 103KB

2010-01-28 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: In its 23 November 2009 covering letter for the filing of its second round interrogatory responses in the proceeding initiated by TNC 2009-261, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) indicated that it would file the response to MTS Allstream(CRTC)6Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261 on 15 December 2009, at the same time as its supplemental responses pursuant to the Commission's determination regarding parties' requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure.

Document: 1349926.zip - 53KB

2010-01-28 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit supplemental responses to the following interrogatories, pursuant to the Commission's letter of 20 January 2010

Document: 1349793.zip - 179KB

2010-01-28 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the direction provided by Commission staff in its letter dated January 20, 2010, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its updated response to interrogatory TELUS(CRTC)06Nov09-4 placing on the public record the list of central offices for which high-speed Internet DSL-capable is available.

Document: 1349624.zip - 73KB

2010-01-28 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to the Commission’s correspondence dated January 20, 2010, Bragg
Communications Inc. is hereby providing the Commission with the public disclosure
requested with regard to Bragg (TekSavvy) 06Nov09-2.

Document: 1349545.zip - 148KB

2009-12-03 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: In its 23 November 2009 interrogatory responses, Primus Telecommunications
Canada Inc. (“Primus”) advised that it would submit revised interrogatory responses to
Primus(CRTC)6Nov09-2 and Primus(CRTC)6Nov09-5 when the responses were
complete.

Document: 1329677.zip - 41KB

2009-12-03 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale highspeed access services, Bragg Communications Inc. is hereby filing a revised response to Bragg (TekSavvy)06Nov09-1 for the public record.

Document: 1329104.zip - 153KB

2009-12-02 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, as amended, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files the following responses to requests for disclosure and further responses to the interrogatories.

Document: 1329059.zip - 138KB

2009-12-02 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261, as modified, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership (Bell Aliant), Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby file their response to requests for pubic disclosure of information.

Document: 1329032.zip - 281KB

2009-12-02 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications

Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted Notice of Consultation, as amended, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits its responses to requests for public disclosure of information filed in confidence and for additional responses with respect to SaskTel’s 23 November interrogatory responses.

Document: 1328995.doc - 71KB

2009-12-02 - Cogeco Cable Inc.

Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009- 261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale highspeed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) is hereby filing a revised
response to Cogeco(TekSavvy)06Nov09-2.

Document: 1328984.zip - 23KB

2009-12-02 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (TNC 2009-261) as amended, Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit joint responses in the Attachment to requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.

Document: 1328968.zip - 106KB

2009-12-02 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 (TNC 2009-261) as amended, Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits its responses in the Attachment to requests for further responses to second round interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed. Please note that responses to certain requests for further responses and disclosure are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).

Document: 1328949.zip - 52KB

2009-12-02 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) received requests for public disclosure, dated 27 November 2009, from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP) and TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvy). In accordance with the procedures identified at paragraph 31 of TNC 2009-261-6, MTS Allstream hereby submits its response to CISP's and TekSavvy's requests.

Document: 1328831.zip - 70KB

2009-11-27 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) is hereby re-filing its response to the CRTC’s interrogatory number 3 that was filed on November 23, 2009. Please replace the earlier document with the attached interrogatory response.

Document: 1326900.zip - 156KB

2009-11-26 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description: On November 23, 2009, the Consumer Groups' filed responses to interrogatories received, respectively, from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and The Cable Companies with respect to the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1326755.pdf - 751KB

2009-11-24 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) inadvertently filed the confidential version of its response to MTS Allstream OOT(CRTC)6Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261 on the public record. MTS Allstream is hereby requesting parties to the proceeding to replace the originally filed version of this response with the attached document.

Document: 1326039.zip - 51KB

2009-11-23 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)

Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from the CRTC, reference number 8663-C12-200907321, dated 06-Noveber-2009 which request to respond to additional interrogatories. Responses are to be filed with the Commission, serving copy on all other parties, by 23 November 2009.

Document: 1327610.pdf - 400KB

2009-11-23 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: Find enclosed the following interrogatory responses from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers to the 2nd round interrogatories.

Document: 1325995.zip - 1,076KB

2009-11-23 - Cybersurf Corp. and Alberta  1356382 Ltd.

Description: Attached are the interrogatory responses of Cybersurf to the CRTC and Cable Companies.

Document: 1325875.zip - 64KB

2009-11-23 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.

Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of
interrogatories from the Commission dated 6 November 2009. Pursuant to the
procedure set out in above referenced proceeding, Primus hereby files its
interrogatory responses

Document: 1325858.zip - 61KB

2009-11-23 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and TekSavvy pursuant to the procedure established in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended. Please note that responses to all other interrogatories are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).

Document: 1325810.zip - 88KB

2009-11-23 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached joint responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended.

Document: 1325681.zip - 801KB

2009-11-23 - Shaw Communications Inc.

Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its responses to the second round of interrogatories received in Notice of Consultation 2009-261 – Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (NC 2009-261). Interrogatory responses that are not included in this filing or that were
addressed to the Cable Carriers are filed as a joint response under separate cover.

Document: 1325666.zip - 372KB

2009-11-23 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: In accordance with procedures set out at paragraph 29 of TNC 2009-261-1, as amended by TNC 2009-261-6, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) hereby submits its responses to the interrogatories asked by the Commission and TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (TekSavvy), with the exception of MTS Allstream(CRTC)6Nov09-2 TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1325620.zip - 221KB

2009-11-23 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the directions provided by Commission staff in its letter dated November 6, 2009, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its attached responses to the Commission’s interrogatories in relation to this proceeding.

Document: 1325541.zip - 223KB

2009-11-23 - Cogeco Cable Inc.

Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale highspeed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits its responses to
interrogatories 1, 2 and 3 addressed to each cable carrier by TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Document: 1325516.zip - 21KB

2009-11-23 - Execulink Telecom Inc.

Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Execulink Telecom Inc.
(Execulink) in the above referenced proceeding.

Document: 1325486.zip - 238KB

2009-11-23 - Télébec, société en commandite

Description: Le 8 mai 2009, le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes ("le Conseil") publiait l’Avis de consultation de télécom CRTC 2009-261 (« Avis 2009-261 ») intitulé Instance visant à étudier le bien-fondé de prescrire certains services d'accès à Internet à haute vitesse disponibles dans le commerce de gros.

Document: 1325438.zip - 40KB

2009-11-23 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.

Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009-261-1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, and the Commission’s letter of 06 November 2009, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the enclosed second round interrogatory responses.

Document: 1325414.pdf - 238KB

2009-11-23 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed
access services, Bragg Communications Inc. hereby submits the responses to
interrogatories filed by Teksavvy, CISP and the Commission that require a specific
company response from Bragg. Interrogatory responses to interrogatories directed to
the Cable Carriers that are not included in this filing are being filed under separate cover
by the Cable Carriers.

Document: 1325395.zip - 203KB

2009-11-23 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit responses to the Commission's interrogatories of 6 November 2009, pursuant to paragraph 29 of TNC 2009-261, as modified.

Document: 1325304.zip - 368KB

2009-11-23 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications

Description: Pursuant to Commission staff’s letter of 6 November 2009, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the attached responses to interrogatories.

Document: 1325238.zip - 280KB

2009-11-23 - Distributel Communications Limited

Description: Pursuant to paragraph 29 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the following responses to interrogatories:

Document: 1325115.pdf - 123KB

2009-11-23 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TSI”) is hereby filing its responses to the interrogatories posed to it on 6 November 2009.

Document: 1325050.zip - 2,575KB

2009-11-23 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description: Further to the Commission's directives on procedure in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-6, please find enclosed the Consumer Groups' responses to interrogatories received, respectively, from TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and The Cable Companies.  We have also attached an Appendix which consists of a copy of the Consumer Groups comments in a Cabinet appeal initiated by the telcos earlier this year.

Document: 1324818.pdf - 1,946KB

2009-11-04 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, and Bell Canada (the Companies)
Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, and Bell Canada (collectively, the Companies) are filing revised Attachments for the Supplemental response to The Companies(CRTC)17Jul09-3 TNC 2009-261.
Document: 1316677.zip - 61KB

2009-10-27 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to the Commission's letter dated 2 October 2009, as modified by its ruling dated 23 October 2009, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are filing their further response to The Companies(TekSavvy)17Jul09-3 TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1307527.zip - 56KB

2009-10-23 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby provides follow-up information relating to the information sought by the Commission in its letter dated October 7, 2009 as further amended by its correspondence to parties dated October 13, 2009. When Bragg filed its further responses on October 16, 2009, we advised the Commission that information
required for the public record in relation to Bragg (CRTC) 17July09-1(d) was not readily
available as further review revealed that the initial information filed was not accurate.
We have since reviewed the information to obtain a more accurate estimate of the
number of high speed Internet capable subscribers and on today’s date Bragg is filing for
the public record its response to this interrogatory.

Document: 1305055.zip - 151KB

2009-10-20 - Shaw Communications Inc.

Description: On 19 October 2009, Shaw filed its supplemental responses and further disclosure pursuant to NC 2009-261.  It has since come to our attention that the table referenced in response to Shaw(Companies)17July2009-16 was inadvertently not included in the responses filed with the Commission and distributed to the Interested Parties.

Document: 1302143.zip - 69KB

2009-10-16 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) hereby submit supplemental responses to the following interrogatories, pursuant to the Commission's letter of 2 October 2009 and the Commission's directions on procedure provided on 13 October 2009 .

Document: 1300497.zip - 227KB

2009-10-16 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, and the Commission’s directives in its 2 and 13 October 2009 letters, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits its supplementary responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1300495.zip - 246KB

2009-10-16 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: Pursuant to Commission staff’s determinations, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files its revised interrogatory responses in relation to Notice 2009-261. TELUS provides disclosure of information designated as confidential, as requested in Attachment 1 of the Commission staff letter dated October 2, 2009.

Document: 1299295.zip - 701KB

2009-10-16 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: In accordance with the process established under NC 2009-261 and the Commission staff letter of 13 October 2009, Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its supplemental responses and disclosures.
Document: 1299187.zip - 711KB

2009-10-16 - Quebecor Media inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.

Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009-261-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, and the Commission staff letters of 2 and 13 October 2009, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), hereby provides the enclosed further interrogatory responses and disclosures.

Document: 1298921.pdf - 1,017KB

2009-10-16 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: As directed in the Commission’s October 2nd letter as amended by the Commission’s October 13th letter, Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits further responses to interrogatories and disclosures.
Document: 1298885.zip - 126KB

2009-10-16 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., ("Bragg") hereby files its reply to the Commission's request for further information of disclosure pursuant to its letter dated October 7, 20009, as further amended by its correspondence to parties dated October 13, 2009.

Document: 1298605.pdf - 147KB

2009-10-16 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby files its reply to the Commission’s request for further information of disclosure pursuant to its letter dated October 7, 2009, as further amended by its correspondence to parties dated October 13, 2009.

Document: 1298574.zip - 222KB

2009-10-16 - Télébec, société en commandite
Description: Le 8 mai 2009 , le Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes ("le Conseil") publiait l'Avis de consultation de télécom CRTC 2009-261 (Avis 2009-261) intitulé Instance visant à étudier le bien-fondé de prescrire certains services d'accès à Internet à haute vitesse disponibles dans le commerce de gros.

Document: 1298243.zip - 91KB

2009-10-16 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications

Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted Notice of Consultation, as amended, the Commission's disclosure rulings of 2 October 2009 and Commission Staff's process letter of 13 October 2009 , Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits the attached supplemental interrogatory responses.

Document: 1298047.zip - 90KB

2009-10-09 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: In accordance with procedures set out at paragraph 26 of TNC 2009-261, as amended by TNC 2009-261-5, and pursuant to the Commission's letter of 2 October 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits the following supplemental responses to interrogatories:

Document: 1292591.zip - 81KB

2009-10-09 - Distributel Communications Limited

Description: Pursuant to the procedures specified in paragraph 26 of TNC 2009-261-5 and Commission staff letter 2 October 2009, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits its revised interrogatory response, Distributel(Cable Carriers)17Jul09-7(b).

Document: 1288277.pdf - 48KB

2009-09-22 - Open Source Solutions (OSS)

Description: Open Source Solutions (OSS) is in receipt of a letter from TELUS dated 15-September-2009 citing requests for further responses to interrogatories.

Document: 1293036.pdf - 243KB

2009-09-22 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)

Description: Pursuant to the procedure established in the above noted Notice of Consultation, as amended, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) submits its responses to requests for public disclosure of information filed in confidence and for additional responses with respect to SaskTel's 31 August interrogatory responses

Document: 1275559.zip - 85KB

2009-09-22 - Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: Please find in the enclosed attachment, the following responses to deficiency requests of TELUS to the the Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc.

Document: 1275557.zip - 12KB

2009-09-22 - Execulink Telecom Inc.

Description: Execulink is in receipt of the following request made by Telus for additional information.

Document: 1275555.pdf - 25KB

2009-09-22 - Accelerated Connections Inc. (ACI)

Description: Accelerated Connections is in receipt of a letter from TELUS Communications, dated 15 September 2009, requesting a further response to an interrogatory _____(Telus)17July09-3 TCN 2009-261.

Document: 1275548.pdf - 30KB

2009-09-22 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)

Description: The Cable Carriers submit joint responses in Attachment 1-6 requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed.

Document:  1275510.zip - 156KB

2009-09-22 - Rogers Communications Inc.

Description: Pursuant to Notice of Consultation 2009-261, as amended, Rogers submits its responses in Attachments 1-6 to requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimes.

Document: 1275488.zip - 150KB

2009-09-22 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: MTS Allstream received requests for further responses and/or public disclosure, dated 16 September 2009, from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers Inc. (CISP) and TekSavvy Solutions Inc.

Document:  1275468.zip - 2194KB

2009-09-22 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description:  Primus is hereby filing revised responses to two interrogatories dated 17 July 2009

Document: 1275423.zip - 69KB

2009-09-22 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus is in receipt of a request, dated 15 September 2009 , for further response to an interrogatory from TELUS Communications Company. Primus hereby submits its response to this request.
Document: 1275297.zip - 56KB

2009-09-22 - Shaw Communications Inc.

Description: Shaw is in receipt of requests from Cybersurf, Distributed, PIAC, CISP, Teksavvy and the Companies for furtehr interrogatory responses and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed addressed in Notice of Consultation 2009-261.

Document: 1275231.pdf - 120KB

2009-09-22 - Cogeco Cable Inc.

Description: In accordance with the procedures of NC 2009-261, Cogeco hereby provides its answer to requests for further interrogatory responses and public disclosure of information for which confidentiality has been claimed addressed to Cogeco specifically or as a cable carrier.

Document: 1275218.zip - 204KB

2009-09-22 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the procedure established by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, as amended, TELUS files the following responses to requests for disclosure and further responses to interrogatories.

Document: 1275206.pdf - 60KB

2009-09-22 - Quebecor Media Inc. (QMI) for Videotron Ltd.

Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009-261-1, 2 and 3, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron, hereby provides the following responses to requests for further responses to interrogatories and for public disclosure received on 15 September 2009.

Document: 1275194.pdf - 41KB

2009-09-22 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to the procedure set out in paragraph 25 of TNC 2009-261, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are filing their responses to the requests for further responses to interrogatories and public disclosure of information

Document: 1275169.zip - 168KB (revised)

2009-09-22 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Notice of Consultation, Bragg Communications is filing its written responses to the requests for the further disclosure or public disclosure of intermation supplied by Bragg in response to the various interrogatories filed by parties to this proceeding.
Document:  1275135.zip - 189KB

2009-09-16 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) is hereby filing its response to MTS Allstream OOT(CRTC)17Jul09-2 TNC 2009-261.

Document: 1272004.pdf - 74KB

2009-09-10 - MTS Allstream Inc.

Description: It has been brought to MTS Allstream's attention that it inadvertently overlooked certain Commission interrogatories. The responses to these are attached, with the exception of the response to MTS Allstream OOT(CRTC)17Jul09-2 TNC 2009-261, which will be provided as soon as possible. MTS Allstream apologies for any inconvenience that the delay in responding to these interrogatories has caused.

Document: 1270012.zip - 119KB

2009-09-08 - TELUS Communications Company

Description: In accordance with the directions provided by the Commission in Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company files its attached responses to certain interrogatories.

Document: 1266364.zip - 92KB

2009-09-08 - Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) for Consumer Groups

Description: It is just been brought to our attention that the responses to the interrogatories ofthe Consumer Groups have not be filed.

Document: 1266260.pdf - 654KB

2009-09-01 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS”) files interrogatories TELUS_ILECs(CRTC)17July09-3 and TELUS_ILECs(CRTC)17July09-5. These interrogatories should have been included in yesterday’s submission. TELUS apologies for any inconvenience.

Document: 1265222.zip - 34KB

2009-09-01 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 17 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies) are attaching the following revised responses to:
Document: 1265190.zip - 88KB

2009-09-01 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 17 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, Télébec, Société en commandite (Télébec or the Company) herein attaches the following additional response it inadvertently omitted from the filing of 31 August 2009:
Document: 1264953.zip - 29KB

2009-08-31 - Bell Aliant Regional Communications, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (the Companies)

Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 17 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, the attached responses to interrogatories are submitted by Bell Aliant Regional Communi ca tions, Limited Partnership, Bell Canada and Télébec, Société en commandite (collectively, the Companies).

Document: 1264326.zip - 27,285KB

2009-08-31 - TELUS Communications Company
Description: In accordance with the directions provided by Commission staff in relation to Notice 2009-261, TELUS Communications Company (“TELUS” or the “Company”) files its attached answers to certain interrogatories.
Document: 1262955.zip - 392KB

2009-08-31 - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
Description: Pursuant to TNC 2009-261, TekSavvy Solutions Inc. (“TekSavvy”) is hereby providing its responses to the first round of interrogatories in this proceeding.
Document: 1263146.zip - 624KB

2009-08-31 - Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi)
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Managed Network Systems Inc. (MNSi) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1263284.zip - 135KB

2009-08-31 - Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel)
Description: Pursuant to the directions specified in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services , as modified by Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Saskatchewan Telecommunications (SaskTel) provides the attached responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1263695.zip - 700KB

2009-08-31 - Distributel Communications Limited
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Distributel Communications Limited (Distributel) hereby submits the following responses to interrogatories:
Document: 1264184.zip - 399KB

2009-08-31 - Rogers Communications Inc.
Description: Rogers Communications Inc. (“Rogers”) submits the attached responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to the procedure established in Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended. Please note that responses to certain interrogatories are being filed under separate cover jointly with Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd and Shaw Communications Inc. (collectively, the Cable Carriers).
Document: 1264205.zip - 527KB

2009-08-31 - Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., for Videotron Ltd. (the Cable Carriers)
Description: Bragg Communications Inc., Cogeco Cable Inc., Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw Communications Inc. and Quebecor Media Inc., on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (collectively, the Cable Carriers) submit the attached joint responses to interrogatories received from the CRTC and parties pursuant to Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261 as amended.
Document: 1264225.zip - 320KB

2009-08-31 - Execulink Telecom
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Execulink Telecom Inc.
(Execulink) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1264232.zip - 384KB

2009-08-31 - Shaw Communications Inc.
Description: Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) herein files its responses to interrogatories received in Notice of Consultation 2009-261 - Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services (NC 2009-261).
Document: 1264243.zip - 952KB

2009-08-31 - MTS Allstream Inc.
Description: In accordance with paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, as revised in TNC 2009-261-1, 4 August 2009, MTS Allstream Inc. (MTS Allstream) submits its responses to the interrogatories addressed to MTS Allstream by the Commission and by each of the following parties:
Document: 1264250.zip - 557KB

2009-08-31 - Quebecor Media Inc. for Videotron Ltd.
Description: In accordance with the procedures established in NC 2009-261, as amended by NC 2009- 261-1, 2 and 3, QMI, on behalf of its affiliate Videotron Ltd. (Videotron), hereby provides the enclosed responses to interrogatories received on 17 July 2009.
Document: 1264278.zip - 612KB

2009-08-31 - Accelerated Connections Inc. (ACI)
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of Accelerated Connections Inc. (“ACI”) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1264272.zip - 83KB

2009-08-31 - EGATE Networks Inc.
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of EGATE Networks Inc.
(“EGATE”) in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1264555.zip - 106KB

2009-08-31 - Cybersurf Corp.
Description: Pursuant to paragraph 23 of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261-1, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Cybersurf hereby submits the attached   responses to interrogatories from The Companies (Bell et al ), The Cable Companies, TELUS, MTS and Distributel.
Document: 1264535.zip - 82KB

2009-08-31 - Bragg Communications Inc.

Description: Bragg Communications Inc., (“Bragg”) hereby files responses to the Commission’s interrogatories, received on July 17, 2009, related to the above-noted proceeding.

Document: 1267596.zip - 1,037KB

2009-08-31 - Bragg Communications Inc.
Description: Responses to Interrogatories.
Document: 1264587.pdf - 18KB

2009-08-31 - Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc.
Description: Primus Telecommunications Canada Inc. (“Primus”) is in receipt of interrogatories from the Commission, MTS Allstream Inc., TELUS Communications Company and the Public Interest Advocacy Centre for Consumer Groups. Primus hereby files its interrogatory responses.
Document: 1264916.zip - 22KB

2009-08-31 - Cogeco Cable Inc.
Description: In accordance with the procedures of Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services, Cogeco Cable Inc. (Cogeco) hereby submits on behalf of its subsidiary Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. its responses to interrogatories.
Document: 126935.zip - 449KB

2009-08-31 - Télébec, Société en commandite
Description: Pursuant to the procedures set out in the Commission's letter dated 7 July 2009, as modified in its letter of 4 August 2009, Télébec, Société en commandite (or Télébec) herein attaches the responses to interrogatories it is submitting individually. Télébec's other responses are submitted as part of the Companies' responses.
Document: 1264943.zip - 211KB

2009-08-31 - The Coalition of Internet Service Providers inc. (CISP)

Description: Find enclosed the following interrogatory responses from the Coalition of Internet Service Providers.
Document: 1264958.zip - 3081KB

2009-08-31 - Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP)
Description: Please find attached interrogatory responses submitted in the above-referenced proceeding by the Canadian Association of Internet Providers on behalf of itself and Acanac Inc., Accelerated Connections Inc., eagle.ca, EGATE Networks Inc., Execulink Telecom, Managed Network Systems Inc., TekSavvy Solutions Inc. and Telnet Communications (collectively, the “Competitors”).
Document: 1264965.zip - 366KB

2009-08-31 - Acanac Inc.
Description: Responses to interrogatories.
Document: 1264991.pdf - 67KB

2009-08-31 - Eagle.ca
Description: Please find attached the interrogatory responses of eagle.ca in the above referenced proceeding.
Document: 1265015.zip - 80KB

2009-08-31 - ABC Communications
Description: Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2009-261, Proceeding to consider the appropriateness of mandating certain wholesale high-speed access services. – Reply to Interrogatories
Document: 1265305.zip - 136KB


Section 8a) Costs

No documents


Section 8b) Others

No documents